Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ROB: Consider root objects without catalog type as fallback #3175

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stefan6419846
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #3164.

@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 changed the title ROB: Consider root objects with catalog type as fallback ROB: Consider root objects without catalog type as fallback Mar 12, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.51%. Comparing base (432b238) to head (c17f4e0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3175      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.53%   96.51%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          53       53              
  Lines        8924     8927       +3     
  Branches     1636     1637       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         8615     8616       +1     
- Misses        185      187       +2     
  Partials      124      124              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Handling of root objects without a Type
1 participant