Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simpler bloch redfield tensor #307

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 9, 2021

Conversation

sd109
Copy link
Contributor

@sd109 sd109 commented Jun 2, 2021

Significantly improves both efficiency and readability of Bloch-Redfield tensor implementation. Also utilizes multi-threading when julia session is running with more than one thread available. I'd say this probably closes #270 too.

@sd109
Copy link
Contributor Author

sd109 commented Jun 2, 2021

I've just noticed the new PR #306 which also makes some changes to the bloch_redfield_tensor function. None of the changes look like they conflict with each other, but will need to double check before merging this.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 2, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #307 (3ad9fde) into master (3871335) will decrease coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 84.84%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #307      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.08%   97.98%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        1305     1288      -17     
==========================================
- Hits         1280     1262      -18     
- Misses         25       26       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/bloch_redfield_master.jl 93.42% <84.84%> (-2.28%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3871335...3ad9fde. Read the comment docs.

@david-pl
Copy link
Member

david-pl commented Jun 7, 2021

@sd109 Thanks for this! The changes look good to me. Is this ready to merge from your side? I will adapt #306 to handle conflicts.

@sd109
Copy link
Contributor Author

sd109 commented Jun 8, 2021

Yeah this is ready to merge as far as I'm concerned.

@david-pl david-pl merged commit e8d46d1 into qojulia:master Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bloch_redfield_master.jl
2 participants