-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Add new composer-filename option #261
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v3 #261 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.65% 97.05% -0.60%
==========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 128 136 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 125 132 +7
- Misses 3 4 +1
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for contributing, and sorry for taking so long to review this.
I've made a slight change, using composer-filename
instead of custom-composer-filename
and setting its default value to "composer"
. I hope this is okay with you.
I believe this change broke workflows that used the |
Description
As discussed in #258 .
This adds a new
composer-filename
option to the action, allowing for adding a custom composer filename, which can be helpful for using composer based on different environments.See: https://getcomposer.org/doc/03-cli.md#composer
Fixes #258.
Motivation and context
See: #258
How has this been tested?
Both unit tests as well as integration tests are included with the PR.
Types of changes
PR checklist