-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-v0.14] Backport CVE-2025-22869 changes to v0.14 from v0.15; Update go to 1.23.0 from 1.22.0 to support x/crypto 0.35 #1829
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: psrvere <prateek.singh.rathore@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: psrvere <prateek.singh.rathore@gmail.com>
68a00dd
to
9990d8a
Compare
@SaschaSchwarze0 - Commits signed. Haven't changed the go version in Github workflows yet. Wanted to see the failure messages first. Please approve workflows. |
Interesting. I had assumed that recent Go versions would complain about compiling Go modules that have a newer version. |
/hold Per discussion in the community call today - as a community, we are "supporting" our latest release with our automated vulnerability detection and bugfix release process. We think the right course of action is to allow PRs to older release branches, however we are not going to issue new z-stream releases for those versions. For this particular PR, I am wary of accepting it because it requires us to upgrade the golang runtime version to 1.23. I assume CI is passing because golang 1.21 introduced "forward compatibility" mechanisms that download SDK toolchains on the fly. One can argue that the With that "cost" in mind, one has to ask "what is the benefit?" CVE-2025-22869 is interesting in that it has a high CVSS score, but only for SSH servers using the x/crypto/ssh package. In Shipwright, we are using ssh packages for client-side SSH operations (most notably to clone source from git). From my understanding of the vulnerability report, client-side operations are not affected. Unfortunately, today's scanning tool ecosystem does not have great mechanisms for code to declare itself "not affected" by a vulnerability. I don't see "make the scanners happy" a strong enough benefit. |
Thanks Adam for the note. Closing the PR. |
Changes
Backport #1755 to release-0.14. This PR
/kind dependency-change
Submitter Checklist
Release Notes