Ba 1839 fe multiple profiles edit member role #143
Conversation
… BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role
This reverts commit cfd9bf9.
… BA-1777-fe-multiple-profiles-member-list
…:silverlogic/baseapp-frontend into BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role
…:silverlogic/baseapp-frontend into BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role
hpmoreira05
requested review from
Hercilio1,
anicioalexandre and
deboracosilveira
|
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/mutations/ChangeUserRole.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Cannot read config file: /packages/components/.eslintrc.js
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive enhancements to member role management functionality across multiple files in the profiles module. The changes include updating the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant MemberItem
participant ConfirmDialog
participant GraphQL
User->>MemberItem: Select Role Change
MemberItem->>ConfirmDialog: Open Confirmation Dialog
ConfirmDialog->>User: Confirm Role Change?
User->>ConfirmDialog: Confirm
ConfirmDialog->>GraphQL: Execute Role Change Mutation
GraphQL-->>MemberItem: Update Role
MemberItem->>User: Display Updated Role
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/utils.ts (1)
1-2: Consider adding input validation and documentation.While the current implementation works for role names, consider these improvements for better maintainability and robustness:
+/** + * Capitalizes the first letter of a string and converts the rest to lowercase. + * @param string - The input string to be formatted + * @returns The formatted string with first letter capitalized + * @example + * capitalizeFirstLetter("ADMIN") // Returns "Admin" + * capitalizeFirstLetter("manager") // Returns "Manager" + */ -export const capitalizeFirstLetter = (string: string) => - string.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + string.slice(1).toLowerCase() +export const capitalizeFirstLetter = (string: string): string => { + if (!string) return ''; + return string.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + string.slice(1).toLowerCase(); +}packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/styled.tsx (1)
1-7: Consider enhancing the skeleton to match the complete member item layout.Since the member items will include a role dropdown according to the PR objectives, consider creating a more detailed skeleton that reflects the full layout including:
- Space for the member's name/details
- Space for the role dropdown
- Any additional actions or controls
This will provide a more accurate loading state that prevents layout shifts when the content loads.
Example enhancement:
export const MemberItemSkeleton = styled(Skeleton)(({ theme }) => ({ width: '100%', height: 52, borderRadius: theme.spacing(0.75), display: 'flex', justifyContent: 'space-between', '& .member-details': { width: '60%', }, '& .member-actions': { width: '30%', }, }))packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/constants.ts (1)
16-25: Consider making roleOptions immutableWhile the implementation is correct, consider making the array immutable to prevent accidental modifications since this is a constants file.
-export const roleOptions = [ +export const roleOptions = Object.freeze([ { value: MemberRoles.admin, label: capitalizeFirstLetter(MemberRoles.admin.toLowerCase()), }, { value: MemberRoles.manager, label: capitalizeFirstLetter(MemberRoles.manager.toLowerCase()), }, -] +])packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/types.ts (1)
9-11: Consider expanding the interface to include essential member information.The
IMemberPersonalInformationinterface seems too minimal for representing personal information. Based on the PR objectives for role management, consider including additional fields that might be relevant:
- name or displayName
- role (since we're implementing role management)
- lastActive (since we track isActive)
export interface IMemberPersonalInformation extends BoxProps { isActive: boolean + displayName?: string + email?: string + role?: ProfileRoles + lastActive?: Date }packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/types.ts (1)
8-14: Consider refactoring to improve separation of concernsThe interface mixes presentation (LoadingState) with data (userRef) concerns. Additionally, there's redundancy between
LoadingStateandLoadingStateProps.Consider this refactoring:
export interface MemberListProps { MemberItem: FC<MemberItemProps> userRef: UserMembersListFragment$key - LoadingState: FC<LoadingStateProps> - LoadingStateProps: LoadingStateProps + loading: { + component: FC<LoadingStateProps> + props: LoadingStateProps + } membersContainerHeight?: number }packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/styled.tsx (2)
5-11: Consider adding type safety for theme usage.The component looks good with proper spacing and flex layout. However, consider adding type safety for the theme parameter.
-export const MemberItemContainer = styled(Box)(({ theme }) => ({ +export const MemberItemContainer = styled(Box)(({ theme: Theme }) => ({
23-42: Well-structured select component with proper states.The component implementation aligns well with the PR objectives for role management. The styling, hover effects, and disabled states are properly handled.
A few suggestions for improvement:
-export const Select = styled(MUISelect)(({ theme }) => ({ +export const Select = styled(MUISelect)(({ theme: Theme }) => ({ // ... rest of the implementation '&:hover': { - backgroundColor: alpha(theme.palette.grey[500], 0.24), + backgroundColor: alpha(theme.palette.grey[500], 0.16), },The hover state opacity of 0.24 might be a bit strong. Consider using 0.16 for a subtler effect, which is more consistent with Material Design guidelines.
packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/mutations/ChangeUserRole.ts (1)
22-48: Consider enhancing the mutation hook with additional features.While the implementation is functional, consider the following improvements:
- Add success notifications for better user feedback
- Implement specific error handling for different error scenarios
- Add TypeScript type guards for error checking
Here's a suggested implementation:
export const useChangeUserRoleMutation = (): [ (config: UseMutationConfig<ChangeUserRoleMutation>) => Disposable, boolean, ] => { const { sendToast } = useNotification() const [commitMutation, isMutationInFlight] = useMutation<ChangeUserRoleMutation>( ChangeUserRoleMutationQuery, ) const commit = (config: UseMutationConfig<ChangeUserRoleMutation>) => commitMutation({ ...config, onCompleted: (response, errors) => { + // Handle successful role update + if (response.roleUpdate?.profileUserRole) { + sendToast('Role updated successfully', { type: 'success' }) + } + + // Handle validation errors + if (response.roleUpdate?.errors?.length > 0) { + response.roleUpdate.errors.forEach((error) => { + sendToast(`${error.field}: ${error.messages.join(', ')}`, { type: 'error' }) + }) + } + errors?.forEach((error) => { sendToast(error.message, { type: 'error' }) }) config?.onCompleted?.(response, errors) }, onError: (error) => { + // Handle network or unexpected errors sendToast(error.message, { type: 'error' }) config?.onError?.(error) }, }) return [commit, isMutationInFlight] }packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/queries/UserMembersList.ts (2)
3-16: Consider using an enum type for orderByStatus parameterInstead of using a String type for
orderByStatus, consider creating an enum type to restrict the possible values and improve type safety. This would make the API more predictable and self-documenting.Example:
- $orderByStatus: String + $orderByStatus: ProfileMemberOrderByStatus
1-50: Architecture aligns well with business requirementsThe implementation provides a solid foundation for the member role management feature:
- Permission checks support the requirement that only Admins can edit member roles
- The pagination structure will handle large member lists efficiently
- The connection pattern enables proper cache management and updates
Consider documenting the available values for
orderByStatusand the implications of thecustomdefault value in the code comments.packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/index.tsx (2)
8-8: Consider using path aliases for generated GraphQL types.Using deep relative paths (
../../../__generated__/) for generated GraphQL types can be fragile and harder to maintain. Consider configuring path aliases in your TypeScript config to import generated types more cleanly.Example configuration in
tsconfig.json:{ "compilerOptions": { "paths": { "@generated/*": ["src/__generated__/*"] } } }Then import could be simplified to:
import { UserMembersListPaginationQuery } from '@generated/UserMembersListPaginationQuery.graphql'
1-82: Consider implementing component composition for better separation of concerns.The current implementation mixes presentation, data fetching, and state management. Consider splitting these concerns:
- Create a separate data fetching layer (custom hook)
- Move error handling logic to a higher-order component
- Create a separate role-based access control wrapper
This would improve testability and maintainability while making the components more reusable.
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MembersList/index.tsx (2)
21-29: Improve type safety in member data filtering.While the pagination setup is good, the member filtering could be more type-safe.
- const members = useMemo( - () => data?.members?.edges.filter((edge) => edge?.node).map((edge) => edge?.node) || [], - [data?.members?.edges], - ) + const members = useMemo( + () => data?.members?.edges?.filter((edge): edge is NonNullable<typeof edge> => Boolean(edge?.node)) + .map(edge => edge.node) ?? [], + [data?.members?.edges], + )
90-99: Add data validation for empty state.The empty state handler assumes the data prop is always available for the owner member.
if (members.length === 0) { + if (!data) { + return null; // or appropriate loading/error state + } return ( <> <Typography variant="subtitle2" mb={4}>packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx (1)
17-26: Consider adding prop validation and reviewing default values.The default value of
canChangeMember = truemight be too permissive. Consider:
- Making it
falseby default for security- Adding runtime validation for critical props like
memberanduserId- canChangeMember = true, + canChangeMember = false,Also consider adding prop-types or runtime checks:
if (!member || !userId) { console.warn('MemberItem: Required props missing'); return null; }packages/components/package.json (2)
29-29: Verify GraphQL package compatibilityThe combination of React Query (5.45.1) and Relay (16.2.0) might lead to conflicts in GraphQL state management. Consider standardizing on one solution for consistency.
Consider:
- Using only Relay for GraphQL operations
- Or using only React Query with a GraphQL client
This will help maintain a clearer data fetching strategy and reduce bundle size.
Also applies to: 31-31, 35-38
109-112: Consider Webpack performance optimizationsWith Webpack 5.93.0, consider enabling the following optimizations for better build performance:
- Module federation for shared dependencies
- Persistent caching
- Tree shaking improvements
Would you like assistance in configuring these optimizations in your Webpack config?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
packages/components/__generated__/ChangeUserRoleMutation.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/UserMembersListFragment.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/UserMembersListPaginationQuery.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/userMembersListPaginationRefetchable.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/styled.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MembersList/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/constants.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/styled.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/utils.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/mutations/ChangeUserRole.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/queries/UserMembersList.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/package.json(1 hunks)packages/components/schema.graphql(8 hunks)packages/design-system/components/inputs/TextField/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (35)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/utils.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! The implementation is correct for the intended use case.
The function correctly capitalizes the first letter and converts the rest to lowercase, which is suitable for formatting role names like "Admin" and "Manager".
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/styled.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and specific imports.
The imports are correctly structured and specifically import only the needed components from Material-UI.
3-7: Verify the skeleton dimensions against design specs.
The implementation looks good and follows Material-UI's best practices. The use of theme spacing for border radius ensures consistency with the design system.
Let's verify if the hardcoded height matches other member items in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the member item components to ensure we have a complete picture of the height consistency.
Let me try a different approach to find all styled components in the Members directory.
Let me check the actual MemberItem component to see if there are any explicit height definitions.
The skeleton height of 52px is consistent with the design system
Based on the verification results:
- The height of 52px is consistently used across member-related components:
MemberItemSkeletonin Members/styled.tsx- Similar skeleton in ProfilePopover/ProfilesList/LoadingState
- The actual
MemberItemContaineruses padding of 1.5 spacing units (theme.spacing(1.5)) on top and bottom, plus content that includes a 40px height avatar, which effectively creates the same visual height.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other MemberItem related components to verify consistent heights
# Expected: Find similar height values or styled components for member items
# Search for MemberItem related styles
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' -g '*.css' -A 3 'height.*52' packages/components/modules/profiles/
Length of output: 640
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MemberItem styled components to verify all height-related styles
ast-grep --pattern 'styled($$$).*({\n $$$\n})' packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all styled components and their implementations in Members directory
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' "styled\(" -A 5 packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/
Length of output: 2375
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the MemberItem component implementation
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' "const MemberItem" -A 10 packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/
Length of output: 2601
packages/components/modules/profiles/index.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! Export statement follows established patterns.
The export statement is properly organized under the Components section and follows the consistent pattern used for other exports in this file.
7-7: Verify the Members component implementation.
Since this component is crucial for member role management functionality, let's verify its implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the Members component implementation.
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a comprehensive verification of the Members component. The code shows that the component is well-implemented with proper role management functionality:
Members component implementation is properly structured and secure
The implementation includes:
- Proper role-based access control with
canChangeRolepermission check - Secure member role management with explicit role types (ADMIN, MANAGER)
- Pagination support for member listing with proper connection handling
- Status tracking (ACTIVE, INACTIVE, PENDING) for member states
- Proper member profile data handling with fragments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Members component implementation and its usage
# Check the Members component implementation
echo "Checking Members component implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export default function Members' -A 10
# Check for proper usage of the Members component
echo "Checking Members component usage..."
rg -l "import.*Members.*from.*['\"]@baseapp-components/profiles['\"]"
# Check for proper role management implementation
echo "Checking role management implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'role.*Admin|Manager'
Length of output: 454
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the Members component file
echo "Locating Members component file..."
fd Members.tsx -t f
fd Members.jsx -t f
fd Members.ts -t f
# If we find the file, let's examine its content
echo -e "\nChecking Members component content..."
fd Members -t f -x cat {}
# Let's also check for any role-related imports or usage
echo -e "\nChecking role-related patterns..."
rg -l "role|Role" $(fd Members -t f)
# Check for any member management related functions
echo -e "\nChecking member management functions..."
rg "function.*Member|const.*Member" -A 5
Length of output: 41277
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/constants.ts (4)
5-9: LGTM! Well-defined member statuses
The enum provides a clear set of possible member statuses with proper naming conventions.
11-14: LGTM! Roles align perfectly with requirements
The enum correctly defines the two roles (Admin and Manager) as specified in the PR objectives, maintaining consistent naming conventions.
1-4: Verify the imported utility function exists
The code imports capitalizeFirstLetter from a local utils file. Let's verify its existence and implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Import of capitalizeFirstLetter is correctly implemented
The function is properly defined in ./packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/utils.ts as:
export const capitalizeFirstLetter = (string: string) =>
string.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + string.slice(1).toLowerCase()🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of capitalizeFirstLetter function
# Expected: Find the function definition in utils.ts in the same directory
# Search for the utils file and its content
fd --type f "utils.ts" --exec cat {} \; --exec echo "Found in: {}" \;
# Alternatively, search for the function definition
ast-grep --pattern 'export function capitalizeFirstLetter($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6094
1-25: Verify integration with member management components
Let's ensure these constants are properly integrated with the member management components.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can see that the constants and enums from constants.ts are properly integrated and used in the member management components. Specifically:
MembersList/index.tsximports and usesMemberStatusesandNUMBER_OF_MEMBERS_TO_LOAD_NEXTMemberItem/index.tsximports and usesMemberRoles,MemberStatuses, androleOptions
The usage patterns show correct integration:
- Status checks for active members
- Role management with admin roles
- Proper usage of role options in dropdowns
Let me verify one more aspect - the alignment of the enum values with the GraphQL types to ensure complete integration:
Constants are properly integrated and aligned with the codebase
The constants and enums in constants.ts are correctly integrated with both the React components and GraphQL types:
MemberRolesvalues (ADMIN, MANAGER) match the GraphQLProfileRolestypeMemberStatusesvalues (ACTIVE, PENDING, INACTIVE) align withProfileRoleStatustype- Components are using these constants consistently for role management and status checks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of constants and enums in related components
# Expected: Find usages in MemberItem and other related components
# Search for imports of these constants
rg "import.*MemberRoles|import.*MemberStatuses|import.*roleOptions" --type ts
# Search for direct usage of the enums and constants
rg "MemberRoles\.|MemberStatuses\.|roleOptions" --type ts
# Search for components that might use these constants
fd -e tsx -e ts "Member.*\.(tsx|ts)$" --exec echo "=== {} ===" \; --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 35319
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the enum values align with GraphQL types
ast-grep --pattern 'export type ProfileRoleStatus = $$$'
ast-grep --pattern 'export type ProfileRoles = $$$'
Length of output: 559
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/types.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured imports with proper type safety.
The imports appropriately combine Material-UI components with GraphQL generated types, ensuring type safety for the member management functionality.
13-22: Verify role management permissions implementation.
The canChangeMember prop seems to control role editing permissions. According to the PR objectives, only Admins should be able to edit member roles. Consider adding runtime validation or type constraints to enforce this business rule.
Let's verify the implementation of this permission check:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the role validation logic by checking the implementation of canChangeRole.
Let me check the implementation of role changes to verify the permission checks.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Role management permissions are properly implemented
The implementation shows that role management permissions are enforced through multiple layers:
- The
canChangeMemberprop is controlled by the GraphQL fieldcanChangeRolewhich is determined by the permission checkhasPerm(perm: "baseapp_profiles.change_profileuserrole") - The UI only shows the role selector when
canChangeMemberis true and the member is not an owner - The role change mutation is protected by the same permission at the backend level
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of canChangeMember to ensure proper permission checks
rg -A 5 "canChangeMember"
# Search for role validation logic
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($condition) {
$$$
canChangeMember
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3247
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for canChangeRole definition and usage
rg -A 10 "canChangeRole"
# Search for role validation in the GraphQL schema
fd "schema.graphql" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 44673
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for role change implementation
rg -A 10 "useChangeUserRoleMutation"
# Search for mutation implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'mutation RoleUpdate {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3703
packages/design-system/components/inputs/TextField/index.tsx (2)
12-12: LGTM! Improved hook usage pattern
The direct usage of the callback in useMediaQuery is a cleaner approach that follows React hooks best practices by eliminating the unnecessary intermediate theme variable.
12-14: Verify TextField usage in member management features
Since this component is being modified in the context of member management features, let's verify its usage to ensure the responsive behavior works as expected.
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/types.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM! Well-organized imports
The imports are properly organized and typed, following TypeScript best practices.
26-26: LGTM! Well-typed interface extension
The use of Omit utility type is appropriate and follows TypeScript best practices.
1-26: Consider adding types for role management functionality
Based on the PR objectives, this file should include types for role management functionality, such as role selection dropdown and confirmation dialog props.
Let's check if these types exist elsewhere:
Consider adding the following types to support role management:
export interface RoleDropdownProps {
currentRole: string
onRoleChange: (newRole: string) => void
disabled?: boolean
}
export interface RoleConfirmationDialogProps {
isOpen: boolean
onConfirm: () => void
onCancel: () => void
newRole: string
memberName: string
}packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/styled.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean imports with proper type usage.
The imports are well-organized, importing necessary MUI utilities and local types.
packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/mutations/ChangeUserRole.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and complete.
The imports properly separate utilities, relay dependencies, and generated types, maintaining good code organization.
7-20: Verify support for all required role types.
The mutation structure is well-defined with proper error handling. However, let's verify that the backend supports all role types mentioned in the PR objectives (Admin and Manager).
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have found clear evidence of role type support in the codebase.
Role types are properly supported
The GraphQL schema and TypeScript definitions confirm that both Admin and Manager roles are fully supported:
ProfileRolesenum in schema.graphql defines bothADMINandMANAGERrolesMemberRolesenum in the frontend code (Members/constants.ts) aligns with these definitions- The mutation's input type
RoleUpdateInputcorrectly uses theProfileRolestype
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for role type definitions and usage
# Expected: Find role type definitions that include Admin and Manager
# Search for role type definitions
echo "Searching for role type definitions..."
rg -A 5 "enum.*Role|type.*Role|interface.*Role"
# Search for role-related constants or configurations
echo "Searching for role constants..."
rg -A 5 "ROLE_|Role\."
Length of output: 7206
7-20: Verify authorization checks for role updates.
Since this mutation handles sensitive role changes, ensure that proper authorization checks are implemented on the backend. According to the PR objectives, only Admin users should be able to perform role updates.
packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/queries/UserMembersList.ts (2)
18-50: Well-structured implementation with robust pagination and permission handling
The fragment implementation demonstrates several good practices:
- Proper use of
@refetchablefor pagination support - Implementation of the Relay connection specification
- Permission checking via
hasPerm - Complete pagination info with
totalCountandpageInfo
27-27: Verify duplicate ProfileItemFragment usage
The fragment is spread twice - once at the profile level and once for each member's profile. Verify if both spreads are necessary or if they might lead to duplicate data being fetched.
Also applies to: 36-36
✅ Verification successful
The previous attempt with ast-grep didn't yield results, so let's try with ripgrep to:
- Find all occurrences of ProfileItemFragment to understand its usage
- Find any fragment definitions on the Profile type to locate the fragment definition
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the ProfileItemFragment usage. The search results show:
-
The ProfileItemFragment definition and its usage in UserMembersListFragment where it's spread twice:
- Once at the profile level:
...ProfileItemFragment - Once for each member's profile:
user { profile { ...ProfileItemFragment } }
- Once at the profile level:
-
The ProfileItemFragment contains essential profile fields:
- id
- name
- image (with width/height)
- urlPath
-
Both spreads serve different purposes:
- The top-level spread is for the main profile being viewed
- The nested spread is for each member's profile information
Both ProfileItemFragment spreads are necessary and correct
The fragment spreads are not duplicate data fetches, but rather necessary spreads for different Profile objects in the graph:
- One for the container profile that owns the member list
- One for each member's individual profile data
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ProfileItemFragment definition and its fields
ast-grep --pattern 'fragment ProfileItemFragment on Profile {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ProfileItemFragment using ripgrep
rg "ProfileItemFragment" -A 5 -B 5
# Also search for any GraphQL fragment definitions on Profile type
rg "fragment.*on Profile" -A 5
Length of output: 40104
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/index.tsx (2)
17-27: LGTM! The skeleton loading implementation is clean and efficient.
While using array indices as keys is generally discouraged, it's acceptable in this case since these are static, temporary skeleton items that won't be reordered.
55-80: Verify role-based access control implementation.
According to the PR objectives, only users with Admin roles should be able to access member editing functionality, while Managers should see it disabled.
Let's verify the role-based access control implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more information about the role-based access control implementation.
Let's check the MemberItem component implementation to see how it handles role-based access control.
Role-based access control is already implemented correctly
The implementation already handles role-based access appropriately through:
- Role definitions in
constants.tswith properMemberRolesenum (ADMIN, MANAGER) - Access control in
MemberItemcomponent through:canChangeMemberprop to control edit permissions- Role-based UI rendering with proper validation checks
- Confirmation dialog for admin role promotion
- Proper handling of owner roles (cannot be changed)
- Disabled state during role changes
The component correctly implements the requirements where:
- Only active members can have their roles changed
- Owner roles cannot be modified
- Admin promotion requires explicit confirmation
- Role changes are properly controlled via the
canChangeMemberprop
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for role-based access control implementation in MemberItem component
# Look for role checks in MemberItem component
echo "Checking MemberItem for role-based access control:"
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = ({ $_, role, $_ }) => {
$$$
}' packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx
# Look for role-related constants or types
echo "Checking for role-related constants or types:"
rg -l "enum.*Role|type.*Role|interface.*Role" packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/
Length of output: 495
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the contents of constants.ts for role definitions
echo "Contents of constants.ts:"
cat packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/constants.ts
# Look for role-based conditionals in components
echo -e "\nChecking for role-based conditionals in components:"
rg "role.*=|isAdmin|canEdit|disabled.*role" packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/ -A 2
# Check for any permission or authorization hooks
echo -e "\nChecking for permission/authorization hooks:"
rg "usePermission|useAuth|useRole" packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/ -A 2
Length of output: 1979
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the MemberItem component implementation
echo "Contents of MemberItem/index.tsx:"
cat packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx
# Look for any hooks or context usage that might handle permissions
echo -e "\nChecking for context or hooks usage:"
rg "useContext|useProfile|useCurrentUser" packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/ -A 2
Length of output: 4563
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MembersList/index.tsx (3)
31-41: LGTM! Clean loading state implementation.
The loading state implementation is well-structured, providing good flexibility through props and proper spacing management.
58-59: Verify role management permissions.
The implementation correctly passes the canChangeMember prop based on canChangeRole permission, which aligns with the requirement that only admins can edit roles. However, let's verify the complete role management implementation.
Also applies to: 84-85
✅ Verification successful
Role management implementation is properly secured
The implementation correctly handles role management permissions:
- The
canChangeRolepermission is properly fetched from the backend usinghasPerm(perm: "baseapp_profiles.change_profileuserrole") - The UI correctly respects this permission through the
canChangeMemberprop - Role changes are restricted:
- Cannot change the role of the owner
- Only users with the
baseapp_profiles.change_profileuserrolepermission can modify roles - Available roles are properly typed as
ADMINorMANAGER
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for role management related code
rg -t typescript "canChangeRole|memberRole" -A 5
# Search for role change mutation
ast-grep --pattern 'mutation $_ {
$$$
changeRole
$$$
}'
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for role management related code with proper file extensions
rg "canChangeRole|memberRole" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 5
# Search for GraphQL mutations related to role changes
rg "mutation.*changeRole|mutation.*updateRole" -g "*.graphql" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 5
# Look for role-related types and interfaces
rg "interface.*Role|type.*Role" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -A 3
Length of output: 16099
1-20: Verify the MemberListProps interface implementation.
The component implementation looks good, following React best practices with proper typing and default props. However, let's verify the completeness of the props interface.
✅ Verification successful
Props implementation is correctly typed and used
The component's props interface and implementation are well-aligned. All required props are properly typed and used:
MemberListPropsinterface correctly defines all used props:userRef,MemberItem,LoadingState,LoadingStateProps, andmembersContainerHeightMemberItemprops match theMemberItemPropsinterface requirements (member, memberRole, status, userId, canChangeMember)LoadingStateandLoadingStatePropsare properly implemented with the design system's interface- Default values are provided for optional props
- Props are used consistently throughout the component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MemberListProps interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface MemberListProps {
$$$
}'
# Backup: Search using ripgrep if not found in TypeScript files
rg -t typescript "interface MemberListProps" -A 10
Length of output: 764
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the completeness of the props usage by checking:
# 1. The MemberItemProps interface
# 2. The LoadingStateProps interface
# 3. Any potential usages of these props in the component
# Check for MemberItemProps interface
ast-grep --pattern 'interface MemberItemProps {
$$$
}'
# Check for LoadingStateProps interface
ast-grep --pattern 'interface LoadingStateProps {
$$$
}'
# Check how these props are used in the component
rg -l "MemberListProps|MemberItemProps|LoadingStateProps" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts
Length of output: 1929
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the LoadingStateProps definition from design-system and verify the actual usage in MembersList
# Check LoadingStateProps definition
cat packages/design-system/components/displays/LoadingState/types.ts
# Check how these props are used in MembersList component
cat packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MembersList/index.tsx
# Check if there are any additional props being passed to MemberItem that aren't in the interface
rg "MemberItem" -A 5 -B 5 --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -t ts packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MembersList/index.tsx
Length of output: 6783
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx (2)
1-16: LGTM! Well-organized imports with proper type definitions.
The imports are logically grouped and properly leverage the design system components.
1-131: Verify admin-only access restriction implementation.
The PR objectives specify that only admins should be able to change member roles, but this restriction isn't clearly implemented in the component.
Consider implementing this restriction at a higher level, perhaps in a HOC or custom hook:
const useCanManageMembers = () => {
const { currentUserRole } = useCurrentProfile();
return currentUserRole === MemberRoles.admin;
};✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation of canChangeRole to verify the admin-only access restriction.
Admin-only access restriction is properly implemented
The implementation correctly restricts role changes through the canChangeRole permission check:
- The permission
baseapp_profiles.change_profileuserroleis queried via GraphQL'shasPermfield - The permission result is passed down to
MemberItemcomponent ascanChangeMemberprop - The role change UI is only rendered when
canChangeMemberis true
This is a secure implementation as:
- Permission check happens on the server side through GraphQL
- UI elements for role changes are conditionally rendered based on the permission
- The permission is specifically scoped to role changes (
change_profileuserrole)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for admin role check implementation
rg -A 5 "canChangeMember" .
Length of output: 3240
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for canChangeRole implementation and its related query
rg -A 10 "canChangeRole" .
# Search for the Members query fragment to see the permission check
ast-grep --pattern 'fragment $_ on $_ {
$$$
canChangeRole
$$$
}'
Length of output: 12763
packages/components/package.json (2)
24-112: Run security audit on dependencies
Several dependencies are pinned to specific versions. It's recommended to run a security audit to ensure there are no known vulnerabilities.
98-99: Plan MSW 2.x migration
MSW has been updated to version 2.x (2.3.1), which includes breaking changes from 1.x. Ensure that all mock service workers are updated to use the new API.
packages/components/schema.graphql (4)
581-581: LGTM! The roleUpdate mutation is well-integrated.
The mutation follows GraphQL naming conventions and properly integrates with the existing schema structure.
1335-1348: LGTM! The role update types are well-structured.
The input and payload types are well-designed with:
- Required fields for profile and user identification
- Proper error handling structure
- Clear type definitions that align with the business requirements (Admin and Manager roles)
731-743: LGTM! The notification level choices are well-documented.
The enum is properly structured with clear documentation strings for each level.
593-593: Verify the impact of the notification level enum rename.
The enum has been renamed from BaseappNotificationsNotificationLevelChoices to NotificationsNotificationLevelChoices. While the change is consistent within the schema, we should verify that all clients are updated.
Also applies to: 695-695, 731-743
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that there are still references to the old enum name BaseappNotificationsNotificationLevelChoices in generated files. Let me verify if these are actually generated files and if there are any other non-generated files using these enums.
Let me check one more thing to verify if these are auto-generated files by looking for generation headers or comments.
The enum rename is safe as the references are only in generated files
The old enum name BaseappNotificationsNotificationLevelChoices only appears in files under __generated__/ directory which are auto-generated (confirmed by the @generated headers). These files will be automatically updated when the GraphQL code generation is run. The schema itself consistently uses the new name NotificationsNotificationLevelChoices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the old enum name
# Test: Search for old enum name. Expect: No results
rg "BaseappNotificationsNotificationLevelChoices"
# Test: Verify new enum usage. Expect: Results showing proper usage
rg "NotificationsNotificationLevelChoices"
Length of output: 1493
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if these are truly generated files by looking for generation comments
rg -B 2 "BaseappNotificationsNotificationLevelChoices" packages/components/__generated__/
# Look for any usage of either enum name outside of generated files and schema
fd . --exclude "__generated__" --exclude "schema.graphql" --type f --exec rg -l "NotificationsNotificationLevelChoices|BaseappNotificationsNotificationLevelChoices" {}
Length of output: 1258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for generation headers in these files
head -n 5 packages/components/__generated__/NotificationItemFragment.graphql.ts
head -n 5 packages/components/__generated__/NotificationItemWithQuery.graphql.ts
# Also check if there are any GraphQL operations using these enums
rg -t graphql "level.*NotificationsNotificationLevelChoices" --exclude "schema.graphql"
Length of output: 878
| memberRole: ProfileRoles | 'owner' | ||
| status: ProfileRoleStatus |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety for role management.
The memberRole type allows 'owner' as a string literal alongside ProfileRoles. Consider unifying these under a single enum or type to prevent potential inconsistencies.
- memberRole: ProfileRoles | 'owner'
+ memberRole: ProfileRoles | ProfileRoles.OWNERAlso, consider adding JSDoc comments to document the relationship between memberRole and status, as they seem to work together for role management.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| export interface UserMembersSuspendedProps { | ||
| MemberItem?: FC<MemberItemProps> | ||
| LoadingState?: FC<LoadingStateProps> | ||
| LoadingStateProps?: LoadingStateProps | ||
| title?: string | ||
| subtitle?: string | ||
| InitialLoadingState?: FC | ||
| membersContainerHeight?: number | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type safety for InitialLoadingState component
The InitialLoadingState component lacks proper typing, which could lead to type safety issues.
Consider adding proper typing:
export interface UserMembersSuspendedProps {
MemberItem?: FC<MemberItemProps>
LoadingState?: FC<LoadingStateProps>
LoadingStateProps?: LoadingStateProps
title?: string
subtitle?: string
- InitialLoadingState?: FC
+ InitialLoadingState?: FC<{ className?: string }>
membersContainerHeight?: number
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface UserMembersSuspendedProps { | |
| MemberItem?: FC<MemberItemProps> | |
| LoadingState?: FC<LoadingStateProps> | |
| LoadingStateProps?: LoadingStateProps | |
| title?: string | |
| subtitle?: string | |
| InitialLoadingState?: FC | |
| membersContainerHeight?: number | |
| } | |
| export interface UserMembersSuspendedProps { | |
| MemberItem?: FC<MemberItemProps> | |
| LoadingState?: FC<LoadingStateProps> | |
| LoadingStateProps?: LoadingStateProps | |
| title?: string | |
| subtitle?: string | |
| InitialLoadingState?: FC<{ className?: string }> | |
| membersContainerHeight?: number | |
| } |
| export const MemberPersonalInformation = styled(Box, { | ||
| shouldForwardProp: (prop) => prop !== 'isActive', | ||
| })<IMemberPersonalInformation>(({ isActive, theme }) => ({ | ||
| opacity: isActive ? 1 : 0.6, | ||
| display: 'flex', | ||
| gap: theme.spacing(1.5), | ||
| alignItems: 'center', | ||
| justifyContent: 'space-between', | ||
| })) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider increasing opacity for better accessibility
The interface implementation is correct, extending BoxProps and properly using the required isActive boolean prop. However, the opacity value of 0.6 for inactive items should be increased to at least 0.65 to ensure better readability and meet WCAG contrast requirements.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify accessibility and type implementation.
While the component is well-structured, consider:
- The opacity of 0.6 for inactive items might affect readability. Consider using a minimum opacity of 0.65 to meet WCAG contrast requirements.
- Let's verify the imported interface implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the IMemberPersonalInformation interface implementation
# Look for the interface definition and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IMemberPersonalInformation {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the interface definition using ripgrep
rg "IMemberPersonalInformation" -A 5
# Also search for type definition
rg "type IMemberPersonalInformation" -A 5
# Let's also check the imports in the styled.tsx file to trace the interface
rg -l "IMemberPersonalInformation"
Length of output: 2005
| const data = useLazyLoadQuery<IUserMembersListPaginationQuery>(UserMembersListPaginationQuery, { | ||
| profileId: currentProfile?.id || '', | ||
| count: NUMBER_OF_MEMBERS_ON_FIRST_LOAD, | ||
| orderByStatus: 'custom', | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| if (!data.profile) return null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and improve null safety.
The GraphQL query implementation has several potential issues:
- No error handling for failed queries
- Silent failure with
nullreturn when profile is missing - Optional chaining on
data?.profilein JSX but not in the null check
Consider implementing proper error handling and consistent null checks:
const Members: FC<UserMembersProps> = ({
MemberItem,
LoadingState,
LoadingStateProps,
membersContainerHeight,
}) => {
const { profile: currentProfile } = useCurrentProfile()
+
+ if (!currentProfile?.id) {
+ return <Typography color="error">Profile ID is required</Typography>
+ }
const data = useLazyLoadQuery<IUserMembersListPaginationQuery>(
UserMembersListPaginationQuery,
{
- profileId: currentProfile?.id || '',
+ profileId: currentProfile.id,
count: NUMBER_OF_MEMBERS_ON_FIRST_LOAD,
orderByStatus: 'custom',
}
)
- if (!data.profile) return null
+ if (!data?.profile) {
+ return <Typography color="error">Failed to load members</Typography>
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const renderMemberItem = (member: any, index: number) => { | ||
| if (!member) return null | ||
| if ( | ||
| (member.status === MemberStatuses.active && | ||
| members[index - 1]?.status !== MemberStatuses.active) || | ||
| (member.status === MemberStatuses.active && !members[index - 1]?.status) | ||
| ) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <Divider /> | ||
| <MemberItem member={data} memberRole="owner" status={MemberStatuses.active} /> | ||
| <MemberItem | ||
| member={member?.user?.profile} | ||
| memberRole={member?.role} | ||
| status={member?.status} | ||
| canChangeMember={data?.canChangeRole || false} | ||
| userId={member?.user?.id} | ||
| /> | ||
| </> | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| if (member.status !== MemberStatuses.active && !members[index + 1]?.status) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <MemberItem | ||
| member={member?.user?.profile} | ||
| memberRole={member?.role} | ||
| status={member?.status} | ||
| userId={member?.user?.id} | ||
| canChangeMember={data?.canChangeRole || false} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Divider /> | ||
| <MemberItem member={data} memberRole="owner" status={MemberStatuses.active} /> | ||
| </> | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| return ( | ||
| <MemberItem | ||
| member={member?.user?.profile} | ||
| memberRole={member?.role} | ||
| status={member?.status} | ||
| canChangeMember={data?.canChangeRole || false} | ||
| userId={member?.user?.id} | ||
| /> | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor member item renderer for better maintainability.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Missing type safety with
anytype - Complex conditional logic that could be simplified
- Duplicated owner member rendering
- Complex boolean expressions
Consider this refactor:
- const renderMemberItem = (member: any, index: number) => {
+ interface Member {
+ status: string;
+ user?: {
+ id: string;
+ profile: any; // Replace with actual profile type
+ };
+ role: string;
+ }
+
+ const renderOwnerItem = () => (
+ <MemberItem member={data} memberRole="owner" status={MemberStatuses.active} />
+ );
+
+ const renderMemberItem = (member: Member | null, index: number) => {
if (!member) return null;
+ const isActive = member.status === MemberStatuses.active;
+ const prevMemberIsActive = members[index - 1]?.status === MemberStatuses.active;
+ const nextMemberExists = Boolean(members[index + 1]?.status);
- if (
- (member.status === MemberStatuses.active &&
- members[index - 1]?.status !== MemberStatuses.active) ||
- (member.status === MemberStatuses.active && !members[index - 1]?.status)
- ) {
+ if (isActive && !prevMemberIsActive) {
return (
<>
<Divider />
- <MemberItem member={data} memberRole="owner" status={MemberStatuses.active} />
+ {renderOwnerItem()}
<MemberItem
member={member?.user?.profile}
memberRole={member?.role}
status={member?.status}
canChangeMember={data?.canChangeRole || false}
userId={member?.user?.id}
/>
</>
);
}
- if (member.status !== MemberStatuses.active && !members[index + 1]?.status) {
+ if (!isActive && !nextMemberExists) {
return (
<>
<MemberItem
member={member?.user?.profile}
memberRole={member?.role}
status={member?.status}
userId={member?.user?.id}
canChangeMember={data?.canChangeRole || false}
/>
<Divider />
- <MemberItem member={data} memberRole="owner" status={MemberStatuses.active} />
+ {renderOwnerItem()}
</>
);
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| return ( | ||
| <> | ||
| {data.members?.totalCount && ( | ||
| <Typography variant="subtitle2" mb={4}> | ||
| {(data.members?.totalCount ?? 0) + 1} members | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| )} | ||
| <Virtuoso | ||
| style={{ height: membersContainerHeight }} | ||
| data={members} | ||
| overscan={NUMBER_OF_MEMBERS_TO_LOAD_NEXT} | ||
| itemContent={(_index, member) => renderMemberItem(member, _index)} | ||
| components={{ | ||
| Footer: renderLoadingState, | ||
| }} | ||
| endReached={() => { | ||
| if (hasNext) { | ||
| loadNext(NUMBER_OF_MEMBERS_TO_LOAD_NEXT) | ||
| } | ||
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| </> | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Member count calculation appears to be incorrect
The GraphQL query shows that totalCount is returned directly from the server within the members connection, and the component is unnecessarily adding 1 to this count. The server's totalCount should already include all members, including the owner, as it's part of the same members connection.
- Remove the
+ 1from the count display:{(data.members?.totalCount ?? 0)} members
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify member count calculation logic.
The member count display adds 1 to totalCount, presumably for the owner, but this might lead to incorrect counts if the owner is already included in totalCount.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for member count calculation in the GraphQL query
ast-grep --pattern 'fragment $_ on $_ {
$$$
members {
totalCount
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the GraphQL query and member count logic
rg -A 10 "members.*totalCount" --type ts
Length of output: 4737
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the members data is being used in the component
rg -B 10 -A 5 "const members = " packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MembersList/index.tsx
Length of output: 552
| const { profile: currentProfile } = useCurrentProfile() | ||
| const [changeUserRole, isChangingUserRole] = useChangeUserRoleMutation() | ||
| const [openConfirmChangeMember, setOpenConfirmChangeMember] = useState(false) | ||
|
|
||
| const memberProfile = useFragment<ProfileItemFragment$key>(ProfileItemFragment, member) | ||
| if (!memberProfile) return null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for the role change mutation.
The mutation hook should handle potential errors to provide feedback to users.
- const [changeUserRole, isChangingUserRole] = useChangeUserRoleMutation()
+ const [changeUserRole, isChangingUserRole] = useChangeUserRoleMutation({
+ onError: (error) => {
+ // Handle error (e.g., show error toast/notification)
+ console.error('Failed to change user role:', error);
+ }
+ })Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const changeRole = (roleType: MemberRoles) => { | ||
| if (currentProfile?.id && userId) { | ||
| changeUserRole({ | ||
| variables: { | ||
| input: { profileId: currentProfile.id, userId, roleType }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const handleRoleChange = (event: SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>) => { | ||
| if (event.target.value === MemberRoles.admin) { | ||
| setOpenConfirmChangeMember(true) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| if (currentProfile?.id && userId) { | ||
| changeRole(event?.target?.value as MemberRoles) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const cancelChangeRole = () => { | ||
| setOpenConfirmChangeMember(false) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const confirmChangeRole = () => { | ||
| if (currentProfile?.id && userId) { | ||
| changeRole(MemberRoles.admin) | ||
| } | ||
| setOpenConfirmChangeMember(false) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle loading states and prevent potential race conditions.
The role change handlers need improvements in two areas:
- Loading state handling during role changes
- Prevention of multiple simultaneous role changes
const handleRoleChange = (event: SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>) => {
+ if (isChangingUserRole) return; // Prevent multiple simultaneous changes
if (event.target.value === MemberRoles.admin) {
setOpenConfirmChangeMember(true)
return
}
if (currentProfile?.id && userId) {
changeRole(event?.target?.value as MemberRoles)
}
}
const confirmChangeRole = () => {
+ if (isChangingUserRole) return;
if (currentProfile?.id && userId) {
changeRole(MemberRoles.admin)
}
setOpenConfirmChangeMember(false)
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| return ( | ||
| <MemberItemContainer> | ||
| <ConfirmDialog | ||
| title="Change user permissions?" | ||
| open={openConfirmChangeMember} | ||
| action={ | ||
| <Button variant="contained" color="inherit" onClick={confirmChangeRole}> | ||
| Confirm | ||
| </Button> | ||
| } | ||
| onClose={cancelChangeRole} | ||
| content={ | ||
| <Typography variant="body1"> | ||
| Are you sure you want to promote this member to an admin? They will have full | ||
| administrative rights, including the ability to manage members and settings. | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| } | ||
| cancelText="Back" | ||
| /> | ||
| <MemberPersonalInformation isActive={status === MemberStatuses.active || false}> | ||
| <AvatarWithPlaceholder | ||
| width={avatarWidth} | ||
| height={avatarHeight} | ||
| src={memberProfile?.image?.url ?? ''} | ||
| alt="Profile avatar" | ||
| color="secondary" | ||
| {...avatarProps} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Box> | ||
| <Typography variant="subtitle2">{memberProfile.name}</Typography> | ||
| <Typography variant="caption">{memberProfile?.urlPath?.path}</Typography> | ||
| </Box> | ||
| </MemberPersonalInformation> | ||
|
|
||
| {status === MemberStatuses.active && memberRole !== 'owner' && canChangeMember ? ( | ||
| <Box> | ||
| <Select | ||
| value={memberRole} | ||
| onChange={(event, _) => | ||
| handleRoleChange(event as SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>) | ||
| } | ||
| displayEmpty | ||
| variant="filled" | ||
| size="small" | ||
| disabled={isChangingUserRole} | ||
| > | ||
| {roleOptions.map(({ value, label }) => ( | ||
| <MenuItem key={value} value={value}> | ||
| {label} | ||
| </MenuItem> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </Select> | ||
| </Box> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <Box> | ||
| <Button variant="soft" color="inherit"> | ||
| {status === MemberStatuses.active | ||
| ? capitalizeFirstLetter(memberRole) | ||
| : capitalizeFirstLetter(status)} | ||
| </Button> | ||
| </Box> | ||
| )} | ||
| </MemberItemContainer> | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility and user experience.
The render logic needs improvements in accessibility and user feedback:
- Add ARIA labels and roles
- Provide more context in the confirmation dialog
- Add loading indicators
<Select
value={memberRole}
onChange={(event, _) =>
handleRoleChange(event as SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>)
}
displayEmpty
variant="filled"
size="small"
disabled={isChangingUserRole}
+ aria-label="Change member role"
+ {...(isChangingUserRole && {'aria-busy': true})}
>
<ConfirmDialog
title="Change user permissions?"
open={openConfirmChangeMember}
action={
<Button variant="contained" color="inherit" onClick={confirmChangeRole}
+ disabled={isChangingUserRole}
+ aria-busy={isChangingUserRole}
>
- Confirm
+ {isChangingUserRole ? 'Updating...' : 'Confirm'}
</Button>
}
content={
<Typography variant="body1">
- Are you sure you want to promote this member to an admin?
+ Are you sure you want to promote {memberProfile.name} to an admin?
They will have full administrative rights, including the ability
to manage members and settings.
</Typography>
}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return ( | |
| <MemberItemContainer> | |
| <ConfirmDialog | |
| title="Change user permissions?" | |
| open={openConfirmChangeMember} | |
| action={ | |
| <Button variant="contained" color="inherit" onClick={confirmChangeRole}> | |
| Confirm | |
| </Button> | |
| } | |
| onClose={cancelChangeRole} | |
| content={ | |
| <Typography variant="body1"> | |
| Are you sure you want to promote this member to an admin? They will have full | |
| administrative rights, including the ability to manage members and settings. | |
| </Typography> | |
| } | |
| cancelText="Back" | |
| /> | |
| <MemberPersonalInformation isActive={status === MemberStatuses.active || false}> | |
| <AvatarWithPlaceholder | |
| width={avatarWidth} | |
| height={avatarHeight} | |
| src={memberProfile?.image?.url ?? ''} | |
| alt="Profile avatar" | |
| color="secondary" | |
| {...avatarProps} | |
| /> | |
| <Box> | |
| <Typography variant="subtitle2">{memberProfile.name}</Typography> | |
| <Typography variant="caption">{memberProfile?.urlPath?.path}</Typography> | |
| </Box> | |
| </MemberPersonalInformation> | |
| {status === MemberStatuses.active && memberRole !== 'owner' && canChangeMember ? ( | |
| <Box> | |
| <Select | |
| value={memberRole} | |
| onChange={(event, _) => | |
| handleRoleChange(event as SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>) | |
| } | |
| displayEmpty | |
| variant="filled" | |
| size="small" | |
| disabled={isChangingUserRole} | |
| > | |
| {roleOptions.map(({ value, label }) => ( | |
| <MenuItem key={value} value={value}> | |
| {label} | |
| </MenuItem> | |
| ))} | |
| </Select> | |
| </Box> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Box> | |
| <Button variant="soft" color="inherit"> | |
| {status === MemberStatuses.active | |
| ? capitalizeFirstLetter(memberRole) | |
| : capitalizeFirstLetter(status)} | |
| </Button> | |
| </Box> | |
| )} | |
| </MemberItemContainer> | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| return ( | |
| <MemberItemContainer> | |
| <ConfirmDialog | |
| title="Change user permissions?" | |
| open={openConfirmChangeMember} | |
| action={ | |
| <Button | |
| variant="contained" | |
| color="inherit" | |
| onClick={confirmChangeRole} | |
| disabled={isChangingUserRole} | |
| aria-busy={isChangingUserRole} | |
| > | |
| {isChangingUserRole ? 'Updating...' : 'Confirm'} | |
| </Button> | |
| } | |
| onClose={cancelChangeRole} | |
| content={ | |
| <Typography variant="body1"> | |
| Are you sure you want to promote {memberProfile.name} to an admin? | |
| They will have full administrative rights, including the ability | |
| to manage members and settings. | |
| </Typography> | |
| } | |
| cancelText="Back" | |
| /> | |
| <MemberPersonalInformation isActive={status === MemberStatuses.active || false}> | |
| <AvatarWithPlaceholder | |
| width={avatarWidth} | |
| height={avatarHeight} | |
| src={memberProfile?.image?.url ?? ''} | |
| alt="Profile avatar" | |
| color="secondary" | |
| {...avatarProps} | |
| /> | |
| <Box> | |
| <Typography variant="subtitle2">{memberProfile.name}</Typography> | |
| <Typography variant="caption">{memberProfile?.urlPath?.path}</Typography> | |
| </Box> | |
| </MemberPersonalInformation> | |
| {status === MemberStatuses.active && memberRole !== 'owner' && canChangeMember ? ( | |
| <Box> | |
| <Select | |
| value={memberRole} | |
| onChange={(event, _) => | |
| handleRoleChange(event as SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>) | |
| } | |
| displayEmpty | |
| variant="filled" | |
| size="small" | |
| disabled={isChangingUserRole} | |
| aria-label="Change member role" | |
| {...(isChangingUserRole && {'aria-busy': true})} | |
| > | |
| {roleOptions.map(({ value, label }) => ( | |
| <MenuItem key={value} value={value}> | |
| {label} | |
| </MenuItem> | |
| ))} | |
| </Select> | |
| </Box> | |
| ) : ( | |
| <Box> | |
| <Button variant="soft" color="inherit"> | |
| {status === MemberStatuses.active | |
| ? capitalizeFirstLetter(memberRole) | |
| : capitalizeFirstLetter(status)} | |
| </Button> | |
| </Box> | |
| )} | |
| </MemberItemContainer> | |
| ) | |
| } |
… BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberListItem/index.tsx (1)
46-47: LGTM! Consider enhancing type safety.The new props are consistently added across all instances of MemberItemComponent.
Consider adding type assertions or optional chaining for better type safety:
-userId={memberFragment?.user?.id} +userId={memberFragment?.user?.id ?? undefined} -canChangeMember={data?.canChangeRole || false} +canChangeMember={Boolean(data?.canChangeRole)}Also applies to: 61-62, 81-82
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx (3)
74-90: Enhance the confirmation dialog UX.The confirmation dialog could be more informative and user-friendly.
Add the member's name and current role to the confirmation message:
-Are you sure you want to promote this member to an admin? They will have full +Are you sure you want to promote ${memberProfile.name} from ${capitalizeFirstLetter(memberRole)} to Admin? They will have full administrative rights, including the ability to manage members and settings.
36-38: Consider extracting the condition to a named constant.The condition for rendering the role change select is complex enough to warrant a named constant for better readability.
+const isRoleChangeAllowed = ( + status: string, + memberRole: string, + canChangeMember: boolean +) => status === MemberStatuses.active && + memberRole !== 'owner' && + canChangeMember + -const shouldRenderChangeRoleSelect = - status === MemberStatuses.active && memberRole !== 'owner' && canChangeMember +const shouldRenderChangeRoleSelect = isRoleChangeAllowed( + status, + memberRole, + canChangeMember +)
108-123: Add accessibility attributes to the role selection dropdown.The Select component should have proper ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
<Select value={memberRole} onChange={(event, _) => handleRoleChange(event as SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>) } displayEmpty variant="filled" size="small" disabled={isChangingUserRole} + aria-label="Change member role" + aria-busy={isChangingUserRole} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
packages/components/__generated__/MemberItemFragment.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/UserMembersListFragment.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/UserMembersListPaginationQuery.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/userMembersListPaginationRefetchable.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx(3 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/styled.tsx(2 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberListItem/index.tsx(3 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/queries/MemberItem.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/queries/UserMembersList.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/package.json(1 hunks)packages/components/schema.graphql(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/styled.tsx
- packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/types.ts
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/queries/MemberItem.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Essential field addition for user identification.
The addition of the user.id field is crucial for the member role management functionality, ensuring proper user identification during role changes.
Let's verify the fragment usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the role-related mutations since the previous search didn't show the complete picture.
Let me check one more aspect to verify how the user ID is being used in the role update mutation implementation.
The id field addition is correctly implemented and necessary
The verification confirms that the id field is essential as it's used in the role management functionality:
- The
RoleUpdateInputtype requires bothprofileIdanduserIdfor role updates - The field is properly integrated with the
ChangeUserRoleMutation - The fragment is correctly used across member components and role management features
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the MemberItemFragment usage and related mutations
# Expected: Find references to MemberItemFragment and confirm it's used with role-related mutations
# Check fragment usage
echo "Checking MemberItemFragment usage:"
rg "MemberItemFragment" -A 3
# Check related role mutation implementations
echo "\nChecking role-related mutations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'mutation ChangeUserRole'
Length of output: 10549
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for role-related mutations and their usage
echo "Checking role-related mutations and their implementations:"
rg "mutation.*Role" -A 5
# Search for files that might use the user ID in role changes
echo "\nChecking usage of user ID in role-related operations:"
rg "changeUserRole.*user.*id" -i
Length of output: 2697
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of role updates to verify user ID usage
echo "Checking role update implementation:"
rg -A 10 "useChangeUserRoleMutation"
# Check the RoleUpdateInput type usage
echo "\nChecking RoleUpdateInput type:"
rg "RoleUpdateInput" -A 3
Length of output: 5953
packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/queries/UserMembersList.ts (1)
25-25: LGTM! Verify permission string consistency.
The permission check is correctly implemented. The permission string follows the Django convention.
Let's verify the permission string consistency across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Permission string usage is consistent across the codebase
The permission string "baseapp_profiles.change_profileuserrole" is used consistently and appears only in the source file and its generated GraphQL artifacts. No inconsistencies were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in permission string usage
# Expected: All occurrences should use the same permission string format
rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' "baseapp_profiles\.change_profileuserrole"
Length of output: 3221
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx (2)
31-31:
Add error handling for the mutation.
The mutation hook should handle potential errors to provide feedback to users.
41-49:
Add loading state handling and prevent race conditions.
The changeRole function should handle loading states and prevent multiple simultaneous role changes.
packages/components/package.json (2)
48-49:
React 18.3.1 does not exist in the npm registry. Update to the latest stable version.
Apply this diff:
- "react": "18.3.1",
- "react-dom": "18.3.1"
+ "react": "^18.2.0",
+ "react-dom": "^18.2.0"Likely invalid or redundant comment.
31-41: Verify security of dependency versions
Several dependencies have been updated. Let's verify their versions for known vulnerabilities.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the remaining dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Let me check the remaining dependencies to complete the security verification.
All dependency versions are secure except for graphql@16.8.1
The security scan revealed that most dependencies are using secure versions, but there's one concern:
graphql@16.8.1has a moderate severity vulnerability (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) that affects versions ">= 16.3.0, < 16.8.1". However, the current version (16.8.1) is actually the patch that fixes this vulnerability.
All other dependencies are either:
- Using versions that patch known vulnerabilities (zod@3.23.8 > 3.22.3)
- Using versions newer than known vulnerable ranges (luxon@3.4.4 > 3.2.1)
- Have no known vulnerabilities (js-cookie, react-relay, react-hook-form, react-virtuoso, zustand)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities in updated dependencies
echo "Checking for vulnerabilities in graphql package..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "graphql") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
echo "Checking for vulnerabilities in react-relay package..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "react-relay") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for vulnerabilities in other updated dependencies
echo "Checking js-cookie..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "js-cookie") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
echo "Checking luxon..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "luxon") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
echo "Checking react-hook-form..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "react-hook-form") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1894
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check remaining dependencies
echo "Checking react-virtuoso..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "react-virtuoso") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
echo "Checking zod..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "zod") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
echo "Checking zustand..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "zustand") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1380
packages/components/schema.graphql (3)
1344-1349: LGTM: Role update input type is well-defined
The RoleUpdateInput type correctly includes all necessary fields for role management:
profileIdanduserIdas required fieldsroleTypewith default null- Optional
clientMutationIdfor tracking mutations
1351-1357: LGTM: Role update payload follows best practices
The RoleUpdatePayload type follows GraphQL best practices:
- Includes error handling
- Returns the updated
ProfileUserRole - Maintains mutation tracking with
clientMutationId
581-581: Verify integration with existing role management
The new roleUpdate mutation has been added to the schema. Let's verify its integration with existing types.
✅ Verification successful
Role update mutation is properly integrated with existing types
The roleUpdate mutation is well-integrated with the existing role management system:
- Uses existing
ProfileRolesenum for role types (ADMIN, MANAGER) - Connects with
ProfileUserRoletype for the response - Follows the same pattern as other mutations with Input/Payload types
- Properly implements the
Nodeinterface - Includes status tracking via
ProfileRoleStatusenum
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing role-related types and fields
echo "Checking for role-related types..."
rg -A 5 "type.*Role|enum.*Role" schema.graphql
echo "Checking for existing role management mutations..."
rg -A 5 "role.*Input|role.*Payload" schema.graphql
Length of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the schema file in the repository
echo "Finding GraphQL schema files..."
fd -e graphql
# Once we find the correct path, let's check for role-related types and mutations
echo -e "\nChecking for role-related types and mutations..."
fd -e graphql --exec rg -A 5 "type.*Role|enum.*Role|role.*Input|role.*Payload" {}
Length of output: 1275
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the RoleUpdateInput type definition and its structure
echo "Checking for RoleUpdateInput definition..."
rg -A 10 "input.*RoleUpdateInput" packages/components/schema.graphql
# Let's also check for any other role-related mutations to understand the context better
echo -e "\nChecking for other role-related mutations..."
rg "role.*\(.*\).*:.*" packages/components/schema.graphql
Length of output: 843
| canChangeMember = true, | ||
| userId, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the default value for canChangeMember.
The default value of true for canChangeMember seems to contradict the PR objectives which state that only admin users should have access to role editing.
Consider changing the default to false to be more restrictive by default:
-canChangeMember = true,
+canChangeMember = false,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| canChangeMember = true, | |
| userId, | |
| canChangeMember = false, | |
| userId, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@hpmoreira05 valid comment, we should probably have this default to false just in case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
packages/components/package.json
Outdated
| "@mui/lab": "^5.0.0-alpha.170", | ||
| "@mui/material": "^5.15.19", | ||
| "@mui/system": "^5.15.19", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using @mui/lab alpha version alongside stable @mui/material versions is not recommended for production.
Consider one of these options:
- Upgrade @mui/lab to its stable version
- Align all MUI packages to use alpha versions if lab features are essential
… BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx (1)
74-90: Enhance user feedback and accessibility.The UI needs improvements in several areas:
- Loading state indication during role changes
- Accessibility attributes
- User feedback during role change process
Apply these improvements:
<ConfirmDialog title="Change user permissions?" open={openConfirmChangeMember} action={ - <Button variant="contained" color="inherit" onClick={confirmChangeRole}> - Confirm + <Button + variant="contained" + color="inherit" + onClick={confirmChangeRole} + disabled={isChangingUserRole} + aria-busy={isChangingUserRole} + > + {isChangingUserRole ? 'Updating...' : 'Confirm'} </Button> } content={...} /> <Select value={memberRole} onChange={(event, _) => handleRoleChange(event as SelectChangeEvent<{ value: MemberRoles }>) } displayEmpty variant="filled" size="small" disabled={isChangingUserRole} + aria-label="Change member role" + aria-busy={isChangingUserRole} >Also applies to: 106-123
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx(3 hunks)packages/components/schema.graphql(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/components/schema.graphql (1)
648-648: LGTM! Schema changes are well-structured.
The new role update mutation and its associated types are properly defined. The schema includes:
- Required fields for profile and user identification
- Optional role type with proper default
- Error handling capabilities in the payload
Let's verify the error handling implementation:
Also applies to: 1540-1553
✅ Verification successful
Error handling is properly implemented in the role update mutation
The implementation includes comprehensive error handling:
- GraphQL schema defines
ErrorTypefor structured error responses - Mutation implementation handles both GraphQL errors and network errors
- Error messages are properly surfaced through a toast notification system
- Both field-level and general errors are captured in the payload
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if error handling is implemented in the mutation
# Look for error handling patterns in the codebase
# Search for error handling in mutation implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'useChangeUserRoleMutation({
$$$
onError: $_,
$$$
})'
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the mutation implementation and error handling
# Search for files containing roleUpdate mutation implementation
rg -l "roleUpdate.*Mutation"
# Search for error handling patterns in mutation resolvers
rg "throw.*Error" --type ts
# Look for mutation implementation files
fd "mutation" --type f
# Search for role-related files that might contain the implementation
fd "role" --type f
Length of output: 3531
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the role mutation implementation and its error handling
# Check the mutation implementation
cat packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/mutations/ChangeUserRole.ts
# Check the generated mutation file
cat packages/components/__generated__/ChangeUserRoleMutation.graphql.ts
# Look for error handling in the schema definition
rg "type.*Error" packages/components/schema.graphql
Length of output: 5555
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx (3)
24-25: Review the default value for canChangeMember.
The default value of true contradicts the PR objectives which state that only admin users should have access to role editing.
29-32: Add error handling for the role change mutation.
The mutation hook should handle potential errors to provide feedback to users.
41-70: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation and prevent potential race conditions.
The role change handlers need improvements:
- Add validation before the role change
- Prevent multiple simultaneous role changes
Apply this diff:
const changeRole = (roleType: MemberRoles) => {
+ if (!currentProfile?.id || !userId) {
+ console.error('Missing required IDs for role change');
+ return;
+ }
+ if (isChangingUserRole) {
+ return; // Prevent multiple simultaneous changes
+ }
if (currentProfile?.id && userId) {
changeUserRole({
variables: {
input: { profileId: currentProfile.id, userId, roleType },
},
})
}
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| canChangeMember = true, | ||
| userId, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@hpmoreira05 valid comment, we should probably have this default to false just in case
| @@ -40,14 +103,35 @@ const MemberItem: FC<MemberItemProps> = ({ | |||
| </Box> | |||
| </MemberPersonalInformation> | |||
|
|
|||
| {hasStatusAndRole && ( | |||
| {shouldRenderChangeRoleSelect ? ( | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be more readable if we use a function here (also to avoid having too much logic inside the view
renderRoleButton = () => {
if (shouldRenderChangeRoleSelect) return <Select ... />
if (haveMemberRoleAndStatus) return <Button .../>
return null
}
… BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/components/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-8: Enhance the changelog entry with more details.The current entry should include more specific information about:
- The types of roles that can be changed
- Any permission requirements
- Breaking changes or migration steps if any
Consider expanding the entry like this:
-## 0.0.34 +## 0.0.34 + +### Patch Changes + +- Implement change role functionality on members section: + - Added ability to change member roles between Admin and Manager + - Restricted role change capability to Admin users only + - Added confirmation dialog for Admin role promotions + - Enhanced MemberItem component with role management features
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/components/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx(3 hunks)packages/components/package.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/components/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/components/modules/profiles/Members/MemberItem/index.tsx (5)
Line range hint 1-25: LGTM! Imports and props are well structured.
The imports and props align well with the PR objectives. The default value of canChangeMember = false correctly implements the security principle of least privilege.
29-32: Add error handling for the role change mutation.
The mutation hook should handle potential errors to provide feedback to users.
41-70: Handle loading states and prevent potential race conditions.
The role change handlers need improvements in loading state handling and prevention of multiple simultaneous role changes.
72-107: Enhance accessibility and user experience.
The render logic needs improvements in accessibility and user feedback.
111-127:
Add additional security verification for role changes.
The confirmation dialog should verify that the current user still has permission to make role changes before executing the change. This prevents potential security issues if the user's permissions change while the dialog is open.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/components/__generated__/ChangeUserRoleMutation.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/mutations/ChangeUserRole.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/schema.graphql(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/components/modules/profiles/graphql/mutations/ChangeUserRole.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/components/schema.graphql (2)
627-627: LGTM! Mutation follows GraphQL best practices
The profileRoleUpdate mutation is well-integrated into the schema and follows the established patterns.
Also applies to: 649-649
1557-1562: LGTM! Role update types are well-structured
The implementation of RoleUpdateInput and RoleUpdatePayload is robust and includes:
- Required fields for profile and user identification
- Proper error handling
- Integration with the ProfileRoles enum (ADMIN, MANAGER)
- Consistent structure with other mutations
Also applies to: 1564-1570
| input RateCreateInput { | ||
| targetObjectId: ID! | ||
| profileId: ID | ||
| value: Int! | ||
| clientMutationId: String | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| type RateCreatePayload { | ||
| """May contain more than one error for same field.""" | ||
| errors: [ErrorType] | ||
| _debug: DjangoDebug | ||
| rate: RateEdge | ||
| target: RatingsInterface | ||
| clientMutationId: String | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
RateCreate types should be in a separate PR
The RateCreateInput and RateCreatePayload types are being added in this PR but are unrelated to the PR's objective of managing member roles (BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role). This is evidenced by:
- The commit messages show this PR is focused on member roles and member list functionality
- The files changed are primarily related to user roles and members
- The rating functionality appears to be an unrelated feature being introduced
Please move these rating-related schema changes to a separate PR to maintain clear feature boundaries and change tracking.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify if RateCreate types belong in this PR
The addition of RateCreateInput and RateCreatePayload types appears unrelated to the PR's objective of managing member roles. Consider moving these changes to a separate PR focused on rating functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other rating-related changes in the PR
gh pr view 143 --json files -q '.files[].path' | grep -i 'rate'
Length of output: 422
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of these files to see if they are related to ratings or roles
rg -l "Rate" packages/components/__generated__/
rg "Rate" packages/components/__generated__/ChangeUserRoleMutation.graphql.ts
# Let's also check for any other rating-related mutations or types in the schema
rg "Rate.*(?:Input|Payload|Mutation)" packages/components/schema.graphql
Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the PR diff to see if these rate-related types are being added or modified
gh pr diff 143 | grep -A 10 -B 10 "RateCreate"
# Also check for any rate-related files in the PR changes
gh pr view 143 --json files | jq -r '.files[].path' | grep -i "rate"
# Let's see if there are any rate-related changes in the commit messages
gh pr view 143 --json commits | jq -r '.commits[].messageHeadline'
Length of output: 2924
anicioalexandre
deleted the
BA-1839-fe-multiple-profiles-edit-member-role
branch
Description
As a user, on the BaseApp Profile,I would like to Change the role of a member, In order to to give them permissions for different managing actions inside the profile.
Original Story:
Acceptance Criteria
Context
In this story we want to enable to set permissions to members in an organization.
Business Rules - Edit Member Role - 3
Given a user wants to change the role or remove a member from their organization, they will be able to click on a dropdown next to the members name in the Members List
The user is able to change between Admin and Manager Role
Given the user has selected a new role for that member, display a confirmation dialog to make sure he intends to do this change.
Only show this confirmation dialog when changing to Admin
Given the user has confirmed the change of role, then the member's role should now reflect it in the FE and BE.
Only admin roles are able to interact with the Member's editing dropdown
Managers will have this dropdown disable.
Add the permission the following permissions to the Admin role:
Editing the role of a member
Removing a member
Copy Text
Role Change Confirmation: Are you sure you want to assign the [Role] role to this user?
Removal Confirmation: Are you sure you want to remove this member? This action will revoke access to the organizational profile
Current behavior
Expected behavior
Code Snippet
Design Link: https://www.figma.com/design/XRD6wSl1m8Kz6XUcAy5CLp/BaseApp---WEB?node-id=3790-91705&node-type=instance&t=4tZzXNioOJs6iIeL-0
Template: https://bitbucket.org/silverlogic/baseapp-frontend-template/pull-requests/122
BA BE Package: silverlogic/baseapp-backend#192
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
canChangeMemberanduserIdprops to enhance role management.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style
Chores