BA-1965: implement reaction notification #161
Conversation
|
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
packages/components/.storybook/preview.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Cannot read config file: /packages/components/.eslintrc.js
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of the notifications module in the frontend components library. The changes focus on creating a more modular and extensible notification system by introducing new components like Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
11-38: Add error handling and loading state for mutationThe mark as read functionality could benefit from some improvements:
- Add error handling for failed mutations
- Show loading state during mutation
- Consider debouncing the click handler to prevent rapid repeated clicks
const NotificationItem: FC<NotificationItemProps> = ({ notification: notificationRef, NotificationItemRenderer = DefaultNotificationContentRenderer, }) => { const notification = useFragment(NotificationItemFragment, notificationRef) + const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false) const commitMutation = useNotificationsMarkAsRead()[0] - const markAsRead = () => { + const markAsRead = useCallback(debounce(async () => { if (notification.unread) { - commitMutation({ - variables: { - input: { - read: true, - notificationIds: [notification.id], - }, - }, - }) + try { + setIsLoading(true) + await commitMutation({ + variables: { + input: { + read: true, + notificationIds: [notification.id], + }, + }, + }) + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to mark notification as read:', error) + } finally { + setIsLoading(false) + } } - } + }, 300), [notification.id, notification.unread, commitMutation])packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
51-78: Add type safety to renderNotificationItem functionThe function uses
anytype for notification parameter which bypasses type checking.- const renderNotificationItem = (notification: any, index: number) => { + const renderNotificationItem = ( + notification: NotificationsListFragment['me']['notifications']['edges'][number]['node'], + index: number + ) => {
🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationCommentBody.tsx (1)
8-14: Consider adding content validation and error handling.While the implementation is clean, consider these improvements for robustness:
- Add validation for empty/null content
- Implement error boundary to gracefully handle rendering failures
+import { ErrorBoundary } from '@baseapp-frontend/error-boundary' + const NotificationCommentBody: FC<NotificationCommentBodyProps> = ({ content }) => ( + <ErrorBoundary fallback={<BodyTypographyContainer>Unable to display comment</BodyTypographyContainer>}> <BodyTypographyContainer> <TypographyWithEllipsis variant="body2" maxHeight={64} lineClamp={2}> - {content} + {content || 'No content available'} </TypographyWithEllipsis> </BodyTypographyContainer> + </ErrorBoundary> )packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar.tsx (2)
3-9: Consider using a dedicated interface for propsFor better maintainability and type safety, consider extracting the props interface.
+interface NotificationAvatarProps { + actorAvatar: string + actorName: string +} + -const NotificationAvatar = ({ - actorAvatar, - actorName, -}: { - actorAvatar: string - actorName: string -}) => ( +const NotificationAvatar = ({ + actorAvatar, + actorName, +}: NotificationAvatarProps) => (
11-12: Consider extracting magic numbersThe fixed dimensions (40x40) should be extracted into a constants file or theme for better maintainability.
+const AVATAR_SIZE = 40 + <AvatarWithPlaceholder - width={40} - height={40} + width={AVATAR_SIZE} + height={AVATAR_SIZE}packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/types.ts (1)
1-1: Consider using path aliases to simplify import pathsThe relative import path with multiple
../segments can make the code harder to maintain and prone to errors during refactoring. Consider configuring path aliases in your module resolver to simplify imports and improve readability.Apply this diff to revise the import statement:
- import { NotificationItemFragment$data } from '../../../../__generated__/NotificationItemFragment.graphql' + import { NotificationItemFragment$data } from '@generated/NotificationItemFragment.graphql'Ensure that the path alias
@generatedis configured in your project's module resolution settings (e.g.,tsconfig.json,babel.config.js, orwebpack.config.js).packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationRoot.tsx (1)
5-9: LGTM! Consider making the layout more configurable.The component implementation is clean and follows good practices. However, to enhance reusability, consider making the grid template and spacing configurable through props.
-const NotificationRoot: FC<PropsWithChildren> = ({ children }) => ( +interface NotificationRootProps extends PropsWithChildren { + gridTemplate?: string; + gap?: number; + padding?: number | string; +} + +const NotificationRoot: FC<NotificationRootProps> = ({ + children, + gridTemplate = "min-content 1fr", + gap = 2, + padding = 2.5 +}) => ( - <Box display="grid" gap={2} gridTemplateColumns="min-content 1fr" padding={2.5}> + <Box display="grid" gap={gap} gridTemplateColumns={gridTemplate} padding={padding}> {children} </Box> )packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/types.ts (2)
11-11: Add JSDoc documentation for the new renderer prop.The new NotificationItemRenderer prop would benefit from documentation explaining its purpose and usage.
+ /** + * Optional custom renderer for notification items. + * If not provided, the default notification renderer will be used. + * @param props NotificationItemRendererProps containing notification data + */ NotificationItemRenderer?: FC<NotificationItemRendererProps>
Line range hint
13-15: Consider making notification type more specific.The GenericItemProps interface uses a generic notification type. Consider creating a union type of specific notification variants for better type safety.
+export type NotificationType = 'COMMENT_CREATED' | 'COMMENT_REPLY' | 'REACTION_CREATED'; + export interface GenericItemProps { - notification: NotificationItemFragment$data + notification: NotificationItemFragment$data & { + type: NotificationType; + } }packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/types.ts (1)
8-15: Group related props and add documentation.The props interface would benefit from logical grouping and documentation of customization options.
+/** + * Props for the NotificationsList component + */ export interface NotificationsListProps { + // State management setIsDrawerOpened: Dispatch<SetStateAction<boolean>> + + // Custom component overrides EmptyState?: FC LoadingState?: FC<LoadingStateProps> - LoadingStateProps?: LoadingStateProps NotificationItem?: FC<NotificationItemProps> NotificationItemRenderer?: FC<NotificationItemRendererProps> + + // Component props + LoadingStateProps?: LoadingStateProps }packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent.tsx (1)
8-11: Consider adding validation for required componentsThe interface defines Header and Body as required, but there's no runtime validation to ensure they're provided when using the component.
Consider adding PropTypes or a custom validation:
import { createContext, useContext } from 'react' const NotificationContentContext = createContext<{ hasHeader: boolean; hasBody: boolean } | null>(null) export interface NotificationContentProps { children: React.ReactNode }packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx (1)
3-7: Consider extracting notification type mapping to a configuration objectThe switch statement could be replaced with a more maintainable mapping configuration.
Consider refactoring to:
const NOTIFICATION_COMPONENTS = { [NOTIFICATION_VERB.commentCreated]: CommentCreated, [NOTIFICATION_VERB.commentReplyCreated]: CommentReply, [NOTIFICATION_VERB.reactionCreated]: ReactionCreated, } as const const NotificationItemRenderer: FC<NotificationItemRendererProps> = ({ notification }) => { const NotificationComponent = NOTIFICATION_COMPONENTS[notification.verb] return NotificationComponent ? <NotificationComponent notification={notification} /> : null }packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationHeader.tsx (2)
8-13: Add prop validation for required fieldsConsider adding default values or null checks for required props to prevent rendering issues when data is missing.
const NotificationHeader: FC<NotificationHeaderProps> = ({ - actorName, - message, + actorName = '', + message = '', unread, - timestamp, + timestamp = '', }) => (
14-34: Enhance accessibility and maintainabilityA few suggestions to improve the component:
- Add aria-label to the header container for screen readers
- Consider extracting the grid template columns value to a constant or theme variable
- Add data-testid attributes for testing
- <Box display="grid"> + <Box + display="grid" + role="heading" + aria-label="Notification header" + data-testid="notification-header" + > <Box display="flex" alignItems="center" justifyContent="space-between" gap={1}> <Box display="grid" gap={0.5} alignItems="center" - gridTemplateColumns="repeat(2, max-content)" + gridTemplateColumns="auto auto" >packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/ReactionCreated/index.tsx (3)
10-11: Remove ESLint disable comment and improve type safetyInstead of disabling ESLint, consider creating a type-safe helper function for handling typename.
- // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle - const message = `liked your ${notification.target?.__typename.toLowerCase()}` + const getTargetType = (target: typeof notification.target) => { + if (!target) return 'content' + const type = target.__typename + return type.toLowerCase() + } + const message = `liked your ${getTargetType(notification.target)}`
13-29: Enhance reusability and reduce repetitionConsider extracting repeated null checks and creating a utility for actor data.
+ const actorData = { + avatar: notification.actor?.avatar?.url ?? '', + name: notification.actor?.fullName ?? '', + } + return ( <Notification.Root> <Notification.Avatar - actorAvatar={notification.actor?.avatar?.url ?? ''} - actorName={notification.actor?.fullName ?? ''} + actorAvatar={actorData.avatar} + actorName={actorData.name} /> <NotificationContent> <NotificationContent.Header message={message} timestamp={formatRelativeTime(notification.timestamp)} - actorName={notification.actor?.fullName ?? ''} + actorName={actorData.name} unread={notification.unread} />
1-32: Consider adding unit testsThis component handles important user interactions and should have comprehensive test coverage.
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for this component? The tests should cover:
- Rendering with different notification types
- Handling missing actor/target data
- Message formatting
packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Address TODO comment regarding storybook implementationThe comment indicates missing storybook coverage for notification components. This should be tracked and addressed.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the storybook implementation task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c2ea87 and 22604e83744e6a7957e93091cb7fd5371e3df3d8.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/components/__generated__/NotificationItemFragment.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentCreated/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentReply/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationCommentBody.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationHeader.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationRoot.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/ReactionCreated/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx(2 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx(3 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/constants.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/graphql/queries/NotificationItem.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationCommentBody.tsx (1)
1-16: LGTM! Clean and modular implementation.
The component follows React best practices with:
- Clear separation of concerns
- Reuse of design system components
- Type safety with TypeScript
- Focused single responsibility
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar.tsx (1)
1-1: Verify design system dependency usage
Ensure that AvatarWithPlaceholder from the design system is the recommended component for avatars in notifications.
✅ Verification successful
AvatarWithPlaceholder is consistently used across notifications
The verification shows that AvatarWithPlaceholder from the design system is indeed the recommended and consistently used component for avatars in notifications:
- It's properly used in
NotificationAvatarcomponent which is shared across all notification types (CommentReply, ReactionCreated, CommentCreated) - The implementation follows a consistent pattern with proper sizing and alt text
- No other avatar components from the design system are used in the notifications module
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent avatar component usage across notifications
rg -l "AvatarWithPlaceholder" --type typescript | grep -i "notification"
# Check if there are other avatar components in use
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@baseapp-frontend/design-system"' | grep -i "avatar"
Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent avatar component usage across notifications
rg -l "AvatarWithPlaceholder"
# Look for other avatar components in notifications
rg "Avatar" --type ts --type tsx | grep -i "notification"
# Check design system imports in notification files
rg "from.*design-system" --type ts --type tsx | grep -i "notification"
Length of output: 1503
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Avatar usage in notification-related files
rg "Avatar" packages/components/modules/notifications/
# Check design system imports in notification files
rg "from.*design-system" packages/components/modules/notifications/
# Look at the implementation of NotificationAvatar
cat packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar.tsx
Length of output: 4182
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/types.ts (1)
1-10: Interfaces are well-defined and enhance type safety
The NotificationCommentBodyProps and NotificationHeaderProps interfaces are appropriately defined, ensuring that the components receive the correct props. This improves type safety and makes the code more maintainable.
packages/components/modules/notifications/constants.ts (1)
4-4: Addition of reactionCreated constant is appropriate
The new constant reactionCreated: 'REACTIONS.REACTION_CREATED' has been correctly added to NOTIFICATION_VERB. This extends the notification types supported by the system and aligns with the existing naming conventions.
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/types.ts (1)
14-14: Verify renderer prop usage consistency.
Let's verify that the NotificationItemRenderer prop is consistently handled across the notification system components.
✅ Verification successful
NotificationItemRenderer is consistently implemented across the notification system
Based on the code analysis, the NotificationItemRenderer prop is consistently handled throughout the notification system components with proper type definitions and implementations:
- It's properly exported from the root index.ts
- Types are consistently defined and imported using NotificationItemRendererProps interface
- Default implementation is provided in NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx
- Properly passed down through component hierarchy:
- NotificationsList -> NotificationItem -> Renderer implementation
- Default fallbacks are implemented at each level
- Proper type checking with FC
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NotificationItemRenderer usage in notification-related components
rg -t typescript "NotificationItemRenderer" packages/components/modules/notifications
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NotificationItemRenderer usage in all files
rg "NotificationItemRenderer"
Length of output: 2522
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all TypeScript files in the notifications module and check their content
fd -e ts -e tsx . packages/components/modules/notifications --exec cat {}
Length of output: 67570
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any renderer-related patterns in notification components
rg "renderer|Renderer" packages/components/modules/notifications/
Length of output: 2560
packages/components/modules/notifications/graphql/queries/NotificationItem.ts (1)
28-32: Verify completeness of Comment fragment fields
The Comment fragment includes basic fields (id, body) but consider if additional fields might be needed for proper rendering, such as:
createdAtfor timestamp displayauthorinformation for attributionparentIdfor reply context
✅ Verification successful
Basic fields are sufficient for notification rendering
The current Comment fragment fields (id, body) are adequate for notification rendering based on the codebase analysis:
-
The notification components (CommentCreated, CommentReply) only use these exact fields:
idfor React keys and referencesbodyfor displaying the comment content
-
Additional suggested fields are not needed because:
timestampcomes from the notification object itself, not the comment- Author information comes from the notification's
actorfield - Parent context is handled through the notification's
targetfield
The fragment is properly structured for its specific use case in notifications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Comment type usage in components to verify field requirements
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Comment {
$$$
}'
# Search for Comment field access in components
rg -t tsx 'notification\.(target|actionObject)\.'
Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Comment type usage in components to verify field requirements
ast-grep --pattern 'interface Comment {
$$$
}'
# Search for Comment field access in components with correct file extension
rg 'notification\.(target|actionObject)\.' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts'
# Search for Comment type usage in GraphQL fragments
rg '(fragment|type|interface).*Comment' -g '*.graphql' -g '*.ts'
# Search for Comment rendering components
rg 'Comment' -g '*.tsx' -A 5
Length of output: 84258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Comment type definition in schema
rg -A 10 'type Comment implements' packages/components/schema.graphql
# Search for Comment fragment usage in notifications
rg -A 10 'fragment.*Comment' packages/components/modules/notifications/graphql/queries/
# Search for notification rendering of comments
rg -A 5 'notification\.(target|actionObject).*Comment' packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/
Length of output: 528
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Comment type usage in notification components
rg -A 10 'notification\.(actionObject|target).*Comment' packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/
# Search for Comment fragment in notification queries
cat packages/components/modules/notifications/graphql/queries/NotificationItem.ts
# Search for comment-related fields in notification components
rg -A 5 'body|created|author' packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/
Length of output: 6781
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentCreated/index.tsx (1)
13-29: Well-structured component with proper null handling
The component follows good practices:
- Uses composition pattern effectively
- Handles null cases with nullish coalescing
- Clear separation of notification parts (avatar, header, body)
packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts (1)
8-26: Well-organized exports with clear component hierarchy
The exports are logically grouped and follow a clear hierarchy:
- Core components (NotificationList, NotificationsPopover)
- Renderer components
- Individual notification type components
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint 24-35: Well-structured component with proper default implementations
Good practices observed:
- Default components provided
- Clear prop interface
- Flexible renderer implementation
Line range hint 91-93: Investigate and resolve overscan TODO comment
The TODO comment indicates a potential stack overflow issue with overscan. This should be investigated as it could impact performance.
Let's check if there are any related issues or discussions:
Would you like help investigating the overscan issue or creating a GitHub issue to track this?
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the virtualization implementation to better understand the overscan issue.
Let me check one more thing to see if there are any reported issues or fixes related to this in the repository.
Overscan configuration disabled due to known stack overflow risk
Based on the findings, this is a known issue affecting multiple virtualized list components (NotificationsList, CommentsList, MessagesList, CommentsReplies). All components have disabled overscan with the same TODO comment, and they all use a consistent batch size of 5 items for loading next content. Since this is a deliberate defensive measure applied consistently across the codebase, the current implementation should be maintained until a proper fix for the stack overflow issue is found.
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx: Current implementation correctly follows the established pattern- Similar implementations in:
packages/components/modules/comments/CommentsList/index.tsxpackages/components/modules/messages/MessagesList/index.tsxpackages/components/modules/comments/CommentItem/CommentsReplies/index.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related overscan discussions or issues
rg -i "overscan|Maximum call stack size exceeded" --type ts
Length of output: 1212
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Virtuoso component usage and configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'Virtuoso $$$'
# Search for any constants related to overscan configuration
rg "NUMBER_OF_NOTIFICATIONS_TO_LOAD_NEXT|MESSAGES_TO_LOAD_NEXT|NUMBER_OF_COMMENTS_TO_LOAD_NEXT" --type ts
Length of output: 1942
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any commits or discussions about the stack overflow issue
rg -i "stack.*overflow.*virtuoso|virtuoso.*stack.*overflow" --type-add 'md:*.md' --type md --type ts
# Check the Virtuoso implementation details
ast-grep --pattern 'new Virtuoso({
$$$
})'
Length of output: 149
| <AvatarWithPlaceholder | ||
| width={40} | ||
| height={40} | ||
| alt={actorName ?? `Notification's user avatar`} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and alt text for accessibility
The nullish coalescing operator implies actorName could be undefined, but the type definition marks it as required. Additionally, the fallback alt text could be more descriptive.
- alt={actorName ?? `Notification's user avatar`}
+ alt={actorName || 'Avatar for notification sender'}If actorName can indeed be optional, update the interface:
interface NotificationAvatarProps {
actorAvatar: string
actorName?: string // Mark as optional
}| // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle | ||
| const message = `added a comment to your ${notification.target?.__typename.toLowerCase()}` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid using __typename directly; consider mapping to user-friendly strings
Accessing __typename directly is not recommended for application logic as it is an internal GraphQL implementation detail. It may also pose issues with minification in production builds and complicates internationalization. Instead, consider mapping the __typename to a user-friendly, localized string.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
- // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle
const message = `added a comment to your ${notification.target?.__typename.toLowerCase()}`
+ const targetTypeName = getTargetTypeName(notification.target)
+ const message = `added a comment to your ${targetTypeName}`And define the getTargetTypeName function:
function getTargetTypeName(target: NotificationTargetType): string {
switch (target?.__typename) {
case 'Post':
return 'post'
case 'Comment':
return 'comment'
// Add other cases as necessary
default:
return 'item'
}
}Optionally, for better internationalization support, use a translation function:
+ import { t } from 'i18next'
- const message = `added a comment to your ${targetTypeName}`
+ const message = t('notification.addedCommentToYour', { targetTypeName })| const NotificationContent: FC<PropsWithChildren> & NotificationContentProps = ({ children }) => ( | ||
| <Box display="grid" gap={1}> | ||
| {children} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix type definition and component structure
The current type definition combining FC with static properties is incorrect and could lead to type errors.
Refactor the component structure:
-const NotificationContent: FC<PropsWithChildren> & NotificationContentProps = ({ children }) => (
+interface NotificationContentComposition {
+ Header: typeof NotificationHeader
+ Body: typeof NotificationCommentBody
+}
+
+const NotificationContent: FC<PropsWithChildren<{}>> & NotificationContentComposition = ({ children }) => (
<Box display="grid" gap={1}>
{children}
</Box>
)Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const NotificationItemRenderer: FC<NotificationItemRendererProps> = ({ notification }) => { | ||
| switch (notification.verb) { | ||
| case NOTIFICATION_VERB.commentCreated: | ||
| return <CommentCreated notification={notification} /> | ||
| case NOTIFICATION_VERB.commentReplyCreated: | ||
| return <CommentReply notification={notification} /> | ||
| case NOTIFICATION_VERB.reactionCreated: | ||
| return <ReactionCreated notification={notification} /> | ||
| default: | ||
| return null | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and logging for notification rendering
The current implementation silently returns null for unknown notification types and lacks error handling for component rendering failures.
Consider implementing these improvements:
+import { ErrorBoundary } from 'react-error-boundary'
+import { logger } from '@utils/logger'
+const NotificationErrorFallback = ({ error }: { error: Error }) => {
+ logger.error('Failed to render notification:', error)
+ return null
+}
const NotificationItemRenderer: FC<NotificationItemRendererProps> = ({ notification }) => {
+ const renderNotification = () => {
switch (notification.verb) {
case NOTIFICATION_VERB.commentCreated:
return <CommentCreated notification={notification} />
case NOTIFICATION_VERB.commentReplyCreated:
return <CommentReply notification={notification} />
case NOTIFICATION_VERB.reactionCreated:
return <ReactionCreated notification={notification} />
default:
+ logger.warn(`Unhandled notification type: ${notification.verb}`)
return null
}
+ }
+
+ return (
+ <ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={NotificationErrorFallback}>
+ {renderNotification()}
+ </ErrorBoundary>
+ )
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle | ||
| const message = `added a comment to your ${notification.target?.__typename.toLowerCase()}` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type guard for __typename access
The direct access to __typename could cause runtime errors if notification.target is null. Consider adding a type guard.
- const message = `added a comment to your ${notification.target?.__typename.toLowerCase()}`
+ const message = `added a comment to your ${
+ notification.target && '__typename' in notification.target
+ ? notification.target.__typename.toLowerCase()
+ : 'item'
+ }`📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle | |
| const message = `added a comment to your ${notification.target?.__typename.toLowerCase()}` | |
| // eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle | |
| const message = `added a comment to your ${ | |
| notification.target && '__typename' in notification.target | |
| ? notification.target.__typename.toLowerCase() | |
| : 'item' | |
| }` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22604e83744e6a7957e93091cb7fd5371e3df3d8 and 7df4504391682de9986b643c43afc3e3e0bc2314.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/components/package.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/components/package.json (2)
53-114: Review major version updates in dev dependencies
Significant updates in testing and development tools:
- Storybook ecosystem updated to v8.4.7
- Testing libraries (@testing-library/*) updated to latest versions
- Build tools (webpack, postcss, etc.) received major version bumps
Consider adding a package-lock.json or yarn.lock file to ensure consistent installations across environments.
✅ Verification successful
Major version updates appear safe to proceed
Based on the verification of the build configuration files and dependencies:
- The webpack configuration is using standard loaders and plugins that are compatible with webpack 5
- Babel configuration is minimal and uses standard presets that are maintained
- PostCSS setup is simple with just tailwindcss and autoprefixer
- Storybook configuration appears to be consistently updated across all related packages to v8.4.7
- All build tools are using stable versions with their corresponding peer dependencies
The updates maintain compatibility with the existing build setup and testing infrastructure. No breaking changes that would affect the current configuration were identified.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify breaking changes in major tool updates
# Check for breaking changes in Storybook v8
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/storybookjs/storybook/releases" | jq '.[] | select(.name | contains("v8.0.0")) | .body'
# Check webpack compatibility
ast-grep --pattern 'webpack.config.$_'
Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the webpack configuration and build setup
# Find webpack config files
fd -e js -e ts webpack.config
# Check for storybook config files
fd -e js -e ts -e cjs -e mjs '.storybook'
# Look for any build or test setup files that might be affected
fd -e js -e ts -e json "jest.config|babel.config|postcss.config|tsconfig"
# Search for webpack related imports or configurations
rg -l "webpack" --type js --type ts --type json
Length of output: 1664
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the webpack configs and build setups for potential breaking changes
# Check webpack config content
cat packages/components/webpack.config.ts
# Check babel config as it's related to the build process
cat packages/components/babel.config.js
# Check postcss config for any custom setup
cat packages/components/postcss.config.js
# Look for storybook main config which might be affected by the v8 upgrade
fd -e js -e ts "main" .storybook
Length of output: 2348
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for Storybook configuration and any potential breaking changes
# Find and check Storybook configuration
fd -g "**/storybook/**" -t f
fd -g "**/.storybook/**" -t f
# Look for any Storybook related imports or configurations in the codebase
rg -l "@storybook" --type js --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# Check package.json scripts related to Storybook
rg "storybook" packages/components/package.json
Length of output: 854
49-50: Verify React version compatibility
The update to React 18.3.1 is significant and needs verification with other dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about React dependencies across the codebase.
Let me check the specific React version requirements in the related packages.
Let me check what this "catalog:react18" reference means by looking at the workspace configuration.
React 18.3.1 update appears compatible with the workspace setup
The verification shows that:
- All dependent packages use
catalog:react18as their peer dependency, indicating a workspace-wide React 18 compatibility requirement - No specific version constraints that would conflict with React 18.3.1
- The official React 18.3.1 release only includes a minor change (exporting
actfrom react)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check compatibility of React version with other dependencies
# Check if any dependencies have React version constraints
rg -l "peerDependencies.*react.*18"
# Check for any React 18.3.1 specific issues
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/facebook/react/releases" | jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("18.3.1")) | .body'
Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for React version references across the codebase
rg -l "\"react\".*18" package.json
# Check for any React-related dependencies in package.json files
fd package.json --exec grep -l "react" {}
# Look for React imports and usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "react"'
Length of output: 423
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check React version specifications in all package.json files
echo "=== packages/provider/package.json ==="
cat packages/provider/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
echo "=== packages/design-system/package.json ==="
cat packages/design-system/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
echo "=== packages/test/package.json ==="
cat packages/test/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
echo "=== packages/wagtail/package.json ==="
cat packages/wagtail/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
echo "=== packages/graphql/package.json ==="
cat packages/graphql/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
echo "=== packages/utils/package.json ==="
cat packages/utils/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
echo "=== packages/config/package.json ==="
cat packages/config/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
echo "=== packages/authentication/package.json ==="
cat packages/authentication/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
Length of output: 1578
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check root package.json for workspace configurations
cat package.json | jq '.catalog'
# Check if there's any workspace configuration file
fd "pnpm-workspace.yaml|lerna.json|rush.json"
# Look for any catalog configuration files
fd "catalog.config.js|catalog.config.json"
Length of output: 150
packages/components/package.json
Outdated
| "@hookform/resolvers": "^3.6.0", | ||
| "@mui/lab": "^5.0.0-alpha.170", | ||
| "@mui/material": "^5.15.19", | ||
| "@mui/system": "^5.15.19", | ||
| "@storybook/react": "^8.4.7", | ||
| "@tanstack/react-query": "^5.45.1", | ||
| "framer-motion": "^11.5.4", | ||
| "graphql": "catalog:graphql", | ||
| "js-cookie": "catalog:", | ||
| "luxon": "catalog:", | ||
| "next": "catalog:", | ||
| "react-hook-form": "catalog:", | ||
| "react-relay": "catalog:graphql", | ||
| "react-virtuoso": "catalog:", | ||
| "relay-runtime": "catalog:graphql", | ||
| "graphql": "^16.8.1", | ||
| "js-cookie": "^3.0.5", | ||
| "luxon": "^3.4.4", | ||
| "next": "14.3.0-canary.24", | ||
| "react-hook-form": "^7.51.5", | ||
| "react-relay": "^16.2.0", | ||
| "react-virtuoso": "^4.7.11", | ||
| "relay-runtime": "^16.2.0", | ||
| "slugify": "^1.6.6", | ||
| "use-long-press": "^3.2.0", | ||
| "zod": "catalog:", | ||
| "zustand": "catalog:" | ||
| "zod": "^3.23.8", | ||
| "zustand": "^4.5.2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Dependencies compatibility check reveals critical issues
Several compatibility concerns need to be addressed:
- @emotion/react and @emotion/styled are missing from dependencies but required by MUI packages
- React v18.3.1 is being used, but @tanstack/react-query v5.45.1 only supports up to React 18.0.0
- Next.js canary version (14.3.0-canary.24) poses stability risks for production use
Required actions:
- Add missing peer dependencies:
"@emotion/react": "^11.5.0", "@emotion/styled": "^11.3.0" - Downgrade React to a version compatible with react-query (18.0.x)
- Consider using a stable Next.js release instead of canary
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify compatibility between core dependencies
Several core dependencies have significant version updates that warrant careful review:
- Material-UI packages (@mui/*) are being updated to v5.15.x
- React Query updated to v5.45.1 (major version bump)
- Next.js using a canary version (14.3.0-canary.24)
Run this script to check for any reported compatibility issues:
Consider using a stable version of Next.js instead of a canary release for production deployments.
Let me verify the peer dependencies of other major packages and check for the presence of required dependencies in package.json.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for known compatibility issues between major dependencies
# Check npm for any peer dependency warnings for @mui packages
npm info "@mui/material@5.15.19" peerDependencies
npm info "@mui/lab@5.0.0-alpha.170" peerDependencies
# Check for any issues with the Next.js canary version
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/vercel/next.js/releases" | jq '.[] | select(.name | contains("14.3.0-canary.24")) | .body'
Length of output: 610
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for required peer dependencies
echo "Checking @tanstack/react-query peer dependencies..."
npm info "@tanstack/react-query@5.45.1" peerDependencies
# Check if required emotion packages are present in package.json
echo -e "\nChecking for required emotion packages..."
grep -A 50 '"dependencies":' packages/components/package.json | grep "@emotion"
# Check React version in package.json
echo -e "\nChecking React version..."
grep -A 2 '"react":' packages/components/package.json | grep -v "react-"
Length of output: 537
priscilladeroode
force-pushed
the
BA-1965-bfp-add-reactions-notification
branch
from
7df4504 to
2db90a4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentReply/index.tsx (1)
16-18: Consider adding prop validation for required fieldsThe component uses nullish coalescing for handling undefined values, but it would be better to validate required fields using PropTypes or TypeScript interfaces.
Example type definition:
interface NotificationActor { fullName: string; avatar?: { url: string; }; } interface NotificationProps extends GenericItemProps { actor: NotificationActor; unread: boolean; timestamp: string; }Also applies to: 23-24
packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-6: Address the TODO comment regarding Storybook integrationThe TODO comment indicates a blocker for Storybook integration due to subscription handling. This should be addressed to ensure proper component documentation and testing.
Would you like me to help create an issue to track the Storybook integration task? I can provide suggestions for mocking subscriptions in Storybook stories.
11-17: Consider grouping related notification componentsThe notification components follow a good hierarchical structure, but the exports could be organized more efficiently.
Consider grouping related exports using a namespace to reduce import complexity:
// Alternative organization using namespaced exports export * as NotificationComponents from './NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification'This would allow consumers to import related components more cleanly:
import { NotificationComponents } from '@components/notifications' // Usage: NotificationComponents.Avatar, NotificationComponents.Content, etc.
Line range hint
1-26: Consider implementing a notification factory patternThe current structure suggests each notification type has its own component. As the number of notification types grows, maintaining individual components might become cumbersome.
Consider implementing a notification factory pattern to:
- Centralize notification rendering logic
- Make it easier to add new notification types
- Reduce code duplication
- Improve maintainability
Example approach:
// NotificationFactory.ts type NotificationConfig = { [key in NotificationType]: { component: React.ComponentType<NotificationProps>; getContent: (data: any) => NotificationContent; } }; const notificationConfig: NotificationConfig = { COMMENT_CREATED: { component: CommentCreated, getContent: (data) => ({ /* ... */ }) }, // ... other types };packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx (2)
11-14: Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentationThe props declaration is well-structured with proper TypeScript typing and default value assignment. However, adding JSDoc comments would improve the component's API documentation.
Add documentation above the component:
+/** + * Renders a notification item with customizable content rendering + * @param {Object} props + * @param {any} props.notification - The notification reference for the Relay fragment + * @param {FC<NotificationItemRendererProps>} [props.NotificationItemRenderer] - Optional custom renderer for notification content + */ const NotificationItem: FC<NotificationItemProps> = ({ notification: notificationRef, NotificationItemRenderer = DefaultNotificationContentRenderer, }) => {
38-38: Clean implementation with potential for optimizationThe renderer implementation is clean and follows good component composition practices. However, consider memoizing the renderer component if the notification data changes frequently.
Consider wrapping the renderer with useMemo:
+ const memoizedRenderer = useMemo( + () => <NotificationItemRenderer notification={notification} />, + [notification, NotificationItemRenderer] + ); return ( <Box onClick={markAsRead} sx={{ cursor: 'pointer', }} > - <NotificationItemRenderer notification={notification} /> + {memoizedRenderer} </Box> )Don't forget to add the useMemo import:
-import { FC } from 'react' +import { FC, useMemo } from 'react'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7df4504391682de9986b643c43afc3e3e0bc2314 and 2db90a47145d609cf54b9dce3ac04868f5b2a4d0.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
packages/components/__generated__/NotificationItemFragment.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentCreated/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentReply/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationCommentBody.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationHeader.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationRoot.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/ReactionCreated/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx(2 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx(3 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/constants.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/graphql/queries/NotificationItem.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/package.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (16)
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/types.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/types.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/types.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/constants.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationRoot.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/types.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/graphql/queries/NotificationItem.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/ReactionCreated/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentCreated/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationHeader.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationCommentBody.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentReply/index.tsx (3)
5-6: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports
The imports are specific and well-structured, properly importing the new notification components.
10-11: Previous review feedback about __typename usage remains unaddressed
The direct usage of __typename with an eslint disable comment is still present. The previous suggestion to use a type mapping function and i18n support remains valid.
14-28: LGTM! Well-structured notification component
The component follows a clean and modular structure using the new Notification components. Good use of component composition and proper handling of optional values.
packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts (2)
8-9: LGTM: Well-structured renderer exports
The NotificationItemRenderer and its types are properly exported, following the pattern of keeping component and type exports together.
22-26: Verify notification type handling completeness
The specific notification type components (CommentCreated, CommentReply, ReactionCreated) seem to cover basic interaction types. Let's verify if all notification types are handled.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try different commands to gather the necessary information.
Let me try to find the notification types and their handling in the codebase.
Let me check the notification constants to see all supported notification verbs.
All notification types are properly handled
Based on the verification of the codebase:
- The
NOTIFICATION_VERBconstant defines exactly three notification types:COMMENTS.COMMENT_CREATEDCOMMENTS.COMMENT_REPLY_CREATEDREACTIONS.REACTION_CREATED
- The
NotificationItemRenderercomponent handles all three types with corresponding components:CommentCreatedCommentReplyReactionCreated
- The exports in the reviewed file match exactly with these notification types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for notification type definitions and verify coverage
echo "Searching for notification type definitions..."
rg -t typescript "type.*NotificationType.*=.*{"
echo "Searching for notification type usages in renderer..."
ast-grep --pattern 'switch ($expr) {
$$$
}' ./packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx
Length of output: 534
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for notification type definitions
echo "Searching for notification type definitions..."
rg "NotificationType" -A 5 -B 5
# Search for notification type components
echo "Searching for notification components..."
fd "Notification.*\.tsx?" --type f
# Search for switch statement in renderer
echo "Searching for switch statement in renderer..."
rg "switch.*type" -A 10 packages/components/modules/notifications
Length of output: 2323
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the notification type components and their implementations
echo "Searching for notification type components..."
rg -t typescript "type.*=.*'.*_CREATED'|type.*=.*'.*_REPLY'" -A 2
# Check the NotificationItemRenderer implementation
echo "Checking NotificationItemRenderer implementation..."
cat packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx
# Look for any other notification-related type definitions
echo "Searching for other notification types..."
rg -t typescript "enum.*Notification|type.*Notification" -A 5
Length of output: 1463
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check notification constants
echo "Checking notification constants..."
cat packages/components/modules/notifications/constants.ts
# Look for any other notification verb usages
echo "Searching for notification verb usages..."
rg "NOTIFICATION_VERB\." -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 1528
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Clean import refactoring
The import changes align well with the new renderer-based architecture, removing specific notification type imports in favor of the new DefaultNotificationContentRenderer.
11-14: Verify renderer pattern implementation
Let's ensure the renderer pattern is consistently implemented across the notification system.
Also applies to: 38-38
✅ Verification successful
Renderer pattern is properly implemented across the notification system
The verification shows that the renderer pattern is consistently implemented:
- The
NotificationItemRendererPropsinterface is properly defined and used across the codebase - The default renderer (
DefaultNotificationContentRenderer) is correctly imported and used as a fallback - The renderer pattern is properly propagated through the component hierarchy:
NotificationsList->NotificationItem->NotificationItemRenderer
- Type definitions and props are consistently used in all related components
- The pattern allows for custom renderers while maintaining type safety
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper implementation of notification renderers
echo "Checking renderer implementations..."
# Find all notification renderer implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ = ({ notification }: NotificationItemRendererProps) => {
$$$
}'
# Verify proper imports of the renderer
rg -l "NotificationItemRenderer.*?import" --type typescript
# Check for any direct usage of specific notification components that should use the renderer
rg -l "CommentReply|CommentCreated|ReactionCreated" --type typescript
Length of output: 390
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the renderer pattern implementation
# Find files containing NotificationItemRenderer
rg "NotificationItemRenderer"
# Find all notification-related components and their implementations
fd -e tsx -e ts "Notification"
# Look for renderer-related type definitions
rg "NotificationItemRendererProps|NotificationRenderer"
# Check for DefaultNotificationContentRenderer usage
rg "DefaultNotificationContentRenderer"
Length of output: 5939
packages/components/package.json (2)
24-119: Security advisory check needed
Given the extensive dependency updates, we should verify for any known security vulnerabilities in the specified versions.
Let's check for security advisories:
34-34:
Critical version compatibility issues
Several critical compatibility issues need to be addressed:
- React v18.3.1 is too new and may cause compatibility issues with other packages
- Using Next.js canary version (14.3.0-canary.24) in production is risky
- @tanstack/react-query v5.45.1 has specific React version requirements
Recommendations:
- Downgrade React to a stable version (18.2.x)
- Use a stable Next.js release instead of canary
- Verify react-query compatibility with chosen React version
Let's verify the compatibility:
Also applies to: 39-39, 54-55
packages/components/package.json
Outdated
| "@testing-library/cypress": "^10.0.2", | ||
| "@testing-library/jest-dom": "^6.4.6", | ||
| "@testing-library/react": "^16.0.0", | ||
| "@testing-library/user-event": "^14.5.2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Testing Library dependencies need version adjustments
The current setup has compatibility issues:
@testing-library/react@16.0.0requires React ^18.0.0 as a peer dependency, which is compatible with React 18.3.1 in the project- However,
@testing-library/reactversion 16.0.0 appears to be incorrect as the latest stable version is 14.x.x. Version 16.0.0 doesn't exist in the npm registry - Other testing library versions are up-to-date and compatible:
@testing-library/jest-dom@6.4.6@testing-library/user-event@14.5.2@testing-library/cypress@10.0.2
Please update @testing-library/react to the latest 14.x.x version:
"@testing-library/react": "^14.2.1"🔗 Analysis chain
Verify testing libraries compatibility
The testing libraries have been updated to their latest versions. However, we need to ensure compatibility with React:
- @testing-library/react v16.0.0 is a major version jump
- jest v29.7.0 and related packages need to be verified with React version
Let's check the compatibility:
Also applies to: 102-103
Let me check the React version in the project to verify compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check testing libraries compatibility
echo "Checking @testing-library/react peer dependencies..."
npm info "@testing-library/react@16.0.0" peerDependencies
echo -e "\nChecking jest-environment-jsdom compatibility..."
npm info "jest-environment-jsdom@29.7.0" peerDependencies
Length of output: 512
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check React version in package.json
echo "Checking React version..."
rg '"react":' packages/components/package.json
# Also check if there are any other testing library related dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking other testing library dependencies..."
rg '"@testing-library/' packages/components/package.json
Length of output: 473
packages/components/package.json
Outdated
| "@emotion/cache": "11.11.0", | ||
| "@emotion/react": "11.11.4", | ||
| "@emotion/styled": "11.11.5", | ||
| "@hookform/resolvers": "3.6.0", | ||
| "@mui/icons-material": "5.15.19", | ||
| "@mui/lab": "5.0.0-alpha.170", | ||
| "@mui/material": "5.15.19", | ||
| "@mui/system": "5.16.12", | ||
| "@mui/x-date-pickers": "7.6.2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
There are several compatibility issues that need to be addressed:
- The project uses React 18.3.1, which is compatible with all MUI packages (they support ^17.0.0 || ^18.0.0)
- @mui/x-date-pickers requires @mui/material ^5.15.14, but the project uses 5.15.19
- @mui/system 5.16.12 is on a different minor version than other MUI packages (5.15.x)
- @emotion dependencies (11.11.x) satisfy all peer dependency requirements (^11.5.0, ^11.3.0, ^11.9.0, ^11.8.1)
Recommendations:
- Downgrade @mui/system to 5.15.19 to maintain consistent minor versions across MUI packages
- Upgrade @mui/material to at least 5.15.14 to satisfy @mui/x-date-pickers requirement
🔗 Analysis chain
Core dependencies compatibility check
The explicit versioning is good, but there are some compatibility concerns:
- The @mui packages (v5.15.x) require @emotion/react and @emotion/styled as peer dependencies
- All @mui packages should ideally be on the same minor version (currently mixing 5.15.x and 5.16.x)
Let's verify the peer dependencies:
Let me verify the React version and check for any potential conflicts with other packages:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check peer dependencies for MUI packages
echo "Checking @mui/material peer dependencies..."
npm info "@mui/material@5.15.19" peerDependencies
echo -e "\nChecking @mui/system peer dependencies..."
npm info "@mui/system@5.16.12" peerDependencies
Length of output: 626
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check React version and other relevant dependencies
echo "Checking React version in package.json..."
rg '"react":|"react-dom":' packages/components/package.json
echo -e "\nChecking @mui/lab peer dependencies..."
npm info "@mui/lab@5.0.0-alpha.170" peerDependencies
echo -e "\nChecking @mui/x-date-pickers peer dependencies..."
npm info "@mui/x-date-pickers@7.6.2" peerDependencies
Length of output: 1118
anicioalexandre
force-pushed
the
BA-1965-bfp-add-reactions-notification
branch
from
2db90a4 to
15d281e
Compare
anicioalexandre
force-pushed
the
BA-1965-bfp-add-reactions-notification
branch
from
15d281e to
4d44a66
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (20)
packages/components/CHANGELOG.md (1)
7-8: Enhance changelog entries with architectural details.While the current entries accurately capture the high-level changes, consider expanding them to better document the architectural improvements:
- Refactors the `notification` module so it is easier to add or modify existing notification types. - Implement reaction notification. + Refactors the `notification` module with new components (NotificationRoot, NotificationAvatar, NotificationContent) for better modularity. + Adds NotificationItemRenderer for dynamic notification type handling. + Implements reaction notifications with new ReactionCreated component.packages/design-system/public/mockServiceWorker.js (2)
190-190: Consider avoiding the delete operator for performance reasonsStatic analysis flagged the usage of
deleteat line 190. While this is an effective way to remove the property from the headers object completely, it has a performance overhead. You may consider setting the property toundefinedor reconstructing the object without this key. However, note that simply setting it toundefinedmight still send an undefined header. If total removal is required, thedeleteoperator is acceptable, but keep the performance tradeoff in mind.- delete headers['x-msw-intention'] + // Either reconstruct the headers object without this field... + const { 'x-msw-intention': _, ...restHeaders } = headers + return fetch(requestClone, { headers: restHeaders })
253-253: Leverage optional chaining for cleaner checksStatic analysis suggests using optional chaining here. Since
event.datamay be undefined, you can simplify the conditional check. This is a minor improvement that reduces nested logical checks.- if (event.data && event.data.error) { + if (event.data?.error) { return reject(event.data.error) }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 253-253: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationBody/types.ts (1)
1-3: Consider simplifying the content type handlingBy allowing
string | null | undefined, you provide flexibility for various states. For some codebases, it might be simpler to treat absent content as an empty string to reduce null checks. If your UI logic relies on explicitly differentiating these states, this is fine; otherwise, defaulting to""or makingcontent?an optional property could simplify usage.packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar/types.ts (1)
1-4: Provide a fallback for missing avatar dataBoth
actorAvatarandactorNameallow null or undefined. In the UI layer, consider providing a default avatar image or a placeholder name. This avoids runtime checks or broken images if these props are null or undefined.packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationHeader/types.ts (1)
1-6: Check if actorName should be strictly required
actorNameis declared to acceptstring | null | undefined, implying it can be missing or empty. If your application always provides an actor name, consider making this astringor using an optional propertyactorName?to clarify usage expectations. Otherwise, ensure the UI handles null or undefined gracefully.packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/types.ts (1)
6-9: Consider a more conventional approach to typing.Currently,
NotificationContentPropsextendsFC<PropsWithChildren>and also specifies static members. Although this pattern technically works, it can be more explicit to separate the component’s prop definitions from its static properties (e.g., define aNotificationContentComponenttype for the component, and aNotificationContentPropsinterface for the public props). This separation can make the code clearer and more maintainable.packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationRoot/index.tsx (1)
6-9: Encapsulate layout spacing with theme-aware values.Using numeric values (e.g.,
gap={2},padding={2.5}) can be perfectly fine, but you may consider referencing your theme’s spacing scale to ensure consistent spacing across your UI. For instance, usetheme.spacing(2)or define a custom spacing variant in your theme to maintain consistency.packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar/index.tsx (1)
7-14: Validate fallback dimensions for the avatar.Using hardcoded values (40px) for width and height is acceptable in some contexts. However, you might consider matching the design system’s standard avatar sizes (if any) to improve consistency. If no standard is defined, continue with these numeric values.
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationBody/index.tsx (1)
8-14: Consider configurability of lineClamp or maxHeight.
Allowing these values to be passed in via props (or theme variables) can make the component more flexible and reusable, especially for different notification lengths.const NotificationBody: FC<NotificationBodyProps> = ({ content }) => ( - <BodyTypographyContainer> - <TypographyWithEllipsis variant="body2" maxHeight={64} lineClamp={2}> - {content ?? ''} - </TypographyWithEllipsis> - </BodyTypographyContainer> + <BodyTypographyContainer> + <TypographyWithEllipsis + variant="body2" + maxHeight={64} // Potentially pass as prop or derive from theme + lineClamp={2} // Potentially pass as prop or derive from theme + > + {content ?? ''} + </TypographyWithEllipsis> + </BodyTypographyContainer>packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx (1)
9-20: Add fallback logging or error monitoring for unknown verbs.
Currently, the default case returnsnull. Consider at least logging an informative warning or sending to an error tracker for debugging ifnotification.verbis unexpected.default: - return null + console.warn(`[NotificationItemRenderer] Received unknown notification verb: ${notification.verb}`); + return null;packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationHeader/index.tsx (1)
29-30: Inclusivity for screen readers.
Consider adding an accessible label or using an ARIA attribute to indicate that this notification is unread, helping visually impaired users understand the notification’s state.{unread && ( + <TimelineDot + color="error" + aria-label="You have an unread notification." + /> )}packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/index.tsx (1)
5-9: Well-structured component composition pattern!The use of compound components pattern provides a clean and flexible API for notification rendering.
Consider adding TypeScript types for better type safety:
+import { FC } from 'react' + +type NotificationType = { + Root: FC<any> // Replace 'any' with actual prop types + Avatar: FC<any> + Content: FC<any> +} + -const Notification = { +const Notification: NotificationType = { Root: NotificationRoot, Avatar: NotificationAvatar, Content: NotificationContent, }packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Address storybook integration TODO.The TODO comment indicates a need to handle subscriptions for storybook integration. This should be addressed to ensure proper documentation and testing.
Would you like me to help create a solution for handling subscriptions in storybook or create an issue to track this task?
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
17-28: Add error handling to mutation.The markAsRead mutation should include error handling to manage failed requests gracefully.
Consider adding error handling:
const markAsRead = () => { if (notification.unread) { commitMutation({ variables: { input: { read: true, notificationIds: [notification.id], }, }, + onError: (error) => { + console.error('Failed to mark notification as read:', error); + // Add error handling logic (e.g., show error toast) + }, }) } }
31-41: Consider debouncing the onClick handler.For better performance and to prevent accidental double-clicks, consider debouncing the onClick handler.
Add debouncing using a utility like lodash:
+import { debounce } from 'lodash' + const NotificationItem: FC<NotificationItemProps> = ({ notification: notificationRef, NotificationItemRenderer = DefaultNotificationItemRenderer, }) => { const notification = useFragment(NotificationItemFragment, notificationRef) const [commitMutation] = useNotificationsMarkAsRead() - const markAsRead = () => { + const markAsRead = debounce(() => { if (notification.unread) { // ... existing code } - } + }, 300)packages/authentication/package.json (1)
13-13: LGTM! Consider future Storybook implementation.The addition of the storybook script placeholder is consistent with other packages. While currently there's no storybook implementation, this serves as a good reminder for potential future integration of authentication component stories.
Consider implementing Storybook for authentication components in the future to showcase different authentication states and flows, which could be valuable for development and documentation.
packages/components/modules/notifications/__storybook__/NotificationsModule.mdx (3)
5-10: Enhance the introduction with usage guidelines.While the introduction provides a good overview, consider adding:
- When to use this notification system
- Key features and benefits
- Any prerequisites or dependencies
# Notifications Documentation ## Notifications System The Notifications system is a modular solution for displaying and interacting with notifications. It includes components to handle lists, individual items, and specific notification types, ensuring consistency and scalability across the application. + +## When to Use + +This notification system is ideal for: +- Applications requiring real-time user notifications +- Systems needing modular and extensible notification handling +- Projects that want to maintain consistent notification UX + +## Key Features + +- Real-time updates via subscriptions +- Modular architecture for easy customization +- Built-in support for common notification types +- Responsive design with mobile support
23-34: Enhance props documentation with additional details.The props tables would be more helpful with the following additions:
- Required/Optional status for each prop
- Default values where applicable
- TypeScript type definitions or interfaces
Example enhancement for NotificationsPopover props:
| Prop Name | Type | Description | -|------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------| -| `Drawer` | `Component` | Custom drawer component. | +|------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|--------------| +| `Drawer` | `Component` | Custom drawer component. | Optional | `undefined` |Consider adding a Types section:
#### Types ```typescript interface NotificationsPopoverProps { Drawer?: React.ComponentType<DrawerProps>; DrawerProps?: Record<string, unknown>; Badge?: React.ComponentType<BadgeProps>; BadgeProps?: Record<string, unknown>; NotificationBellIcon?: React.ComponentType<IconProps>; NotificationBellIconProps?: Record<string, unknown>; NotificationsList?: React.ComponentType<NotificationsListProps>; NotificationsListProps?: Record<string, unknown>; }Also applies to: 45-52, 62-67, 77-82, 92-96
113-186: Add more comprehensive usage examples.Consider adding examples for:
- Error handling and fallback UI
- Subscription setup and cleanup
- Real-world scenarios with multiple notification types
Add these additional examples:
### Error Handling Example ```typescript const ErrorFallback = ({ error }) => ( <div role="alert"> <p>Something went wrong:</p> <pre>{error.message}</pre> </div> ); const Example = () => ( <ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={ErrorFallback}> <NotificationsPopover LoadingState={CustomLoadingState} ErrorState={CustomErrorState} /> </ErrorBoundary> );Subscription Example
const Example = () => { useEffect(() => { const subscription = notificationsSubscription.subscribe({ next: (notification) => { // Handle new notification }, error: (error) => { // Handle error } }); return () => subscription.unsubscribe(); }, []); return <NotificationsPopover />; };</blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🛑 Comments failed to post (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>packages/components/modules/notifications/__storybook__/NotificationsModule.mdx (1)</summary><blockquote> 17-22: _:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Add accessibility documentation.** The component documentation should include accessibility considerations: - ARIA attributes - Keyboard navigation - Screen reader support Add an Accessibility section: ```markdown ## Accessibility ### ARIA Attributes - The notification bell uses `aria-label="Notifications"` and `aria-expanded` to indicate drawer state - The notification count uses `aria-live="polite"` for screen reader announcements - Notifications use `aria-atomic="true"` to ensure complete reading ### Keyboard Navigation - `Enter` or `Space`: Toggle notifications drawer - `Tab`: Navigate through notifications - `Escape`: Close drawer ### Screen Reader Considerations - Notification timestamps use `aria-label` with relative time (e.g., "2 hours ago") - Images and icons include descriptive alt text - Dynamic content updates are announced appropriately
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentReply/index.tsx (1)
9-10:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using
__typenamedirectly in message constructionThis issue was previously identified. Direct usage of
__typenameremains problematic as it's an internal GraphQL implementation detail.Please refer to the previous review comment for the recommended solution using a
getTargetTypeNamefunction and proper i18n support.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Address TODO comment regarding storybook implementationThe TODO comment indicates missing storybook implementation due to subscription handling challenges.
Would you like me to help create a solution for handling subscriptions in storybook, or should I create a GitHub issue to track this task?
packages/components/modules/notifications/__storybook__/NotificationsModule.mdx (1)
117-124: Add TypeScript types to code examplesThe code examples would benefit from TypeScript types for better developer experience and documentation.
Example enhancement:
- const Example = () => ( + const Example: React.FC = () => ( <NotificationsPopover /> ); - const NotificationItemRenderer = ({ notification }) => { + const NotificationItemRenderer: React.FC<{ notification: NotificationType }> = ({ notification }) => {Also applies to: 132-143
packages/design-system/public/mockServiceWorker.js (1)
191-191: Consider performance impact of delete operatorThe static analyzer flagged the use of the
deleteoperator. While it's intentionally used here for CORS compliance, consider the alternative approach if performance is critical:- delete headers['x-msw-intention'] + headers['x-msw-intention'] = undefinedNote: The current implementation is acceptable as the performance impact is negligible in this testing context.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 191-191: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 15d281e4b91aa7eba482269e8eaf3dddf5622bf8 and 4d44a66.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
packages/components/__generated__/NotificationItemWithQuery.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/NotificationsListQuery.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/notificationsListRefetchable.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/useMessageCountUpdateSubscription.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**packages/components/__generated__/useNotificationsSubscription.graphql.tsis excluded by!**/__generated__/**pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
package.json(1 hunks)packages/authentication/package.json(1 hunks)packages/components/.storybook/preview.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentCreated/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentReply/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationBody/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationBody/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationHeader/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationHeader/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationRoot/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/NotificationItemRenderer/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/ReactionCreated/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx(2 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx(2 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/types.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/__storybook__/NotificationsModule.mdx(1 hunks)packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/components/package.json(2 hunks)packages/design-system/.storybook/preview.ts(1 hunks)packages/design-system/public/mockServiceWorker.js(1 hunks)packages/eslint-plugin/package.json(1 hunks)packages/graphql/package.json(1 hunks)packages/provider/package.json(1 hunks)packages/test/package.json(1 hunks)packages/utils/package.json(1 hunks)packages/wagtail/package.json(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (29)
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationBody/types.ts
- packages/graphql/package.json
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/types.ts
- packages/components/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/types.ts
- package.json
- packages/provider/package.json
- packages/components/.storybook/preview.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationRoot/index.tsx
- packages/wagtail/package.json
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationHeader/types.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar/types.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/index.tsx
- packages/authentication/package.json
- packages/design-system/.storybook/preview.ts
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/types.ts
- packages/eslint-plugin/package.json
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/NotificationItemRenderer/types.ts
- packages/utils/package.json
- packages/test/package.json
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationAvatar/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/ReactionCreated/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentCreated/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationHeader/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/NotificationItemRenderer/index.tsx
- packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/Notification/NotificationContent/NotificationBody/index.tsx
- packages/components/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/design-system/public/mockServiceWorker.js
[error] 191-191: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 253-253: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/CommentReply/index.tsx (1)
13-27: Well-structured implementation using compound components
The implementation follows a clean compound component pattern with clear separation of concerns:
- Root wrapper for layout
- Avatar section for user representation
- Content section with header and body
packages/components/modules/notifications/index.ts (1)
8-20: Well-organized export structure
The exports are clearly organized by component type and include both component and type exports, making the module's public API clear and maintainable.
packages/components/modules/notifications/__storybook__/NotificationsModule.mdx (1)
1-186: Comprehensive and well-structured documentation
The documentation provides:
- Clear component purposes and behaviors
- Detailed props tables
- Practical usage examples
- Implementation guidelines for extensibility
packages/components/modules/notifications/NotificationsList/NotificationItem/index.tsx (4)
8-8: LGTM! Clean import of the new renderer component.
The import of DefaultNotificationItemRenderer aligns with the architectural changes to make the notification system more modular.
17-18: Minor formatting change.
11-14: LGTM! Well-structured component props with proper default assignment.
The component signature changes enhance flexibility while maintaining backward compatibility. The TypeScript types ensure type safety.
Let's verify that the NotificationItemProps interface is properly updated:
✅ Verification successful
Props interface correctly defines the optional NotificationItemRenderer
The verification confirms that the NotificationItemProps interface in types.ts properly includes the optional NotificationItemRenderer prop with the correct type FC<NotificationItemRendererProps>. This matches the component's implementation and ensures type safety.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the NotificationItemProps interface includes the new renderer prop
ast-grep --pattern 'interface NotificationItemProps {
$$$
NotificationItemRenderer?: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 608
39-39: Clean implementation of the renderer pattern.
The delegation of rendering logic to a dedicated renderer component follows good separation of concerns. This makes the notification system more maintainable and extensible.
This pattern allows for:
- Easy addition of new notification types
- Custom renderers for different contexts
- Better testability of rendering logic
Let's verify that DefaultNotificationItemRenderer handles all notification types:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the available notification verbs to ensure the renderer handles all cases.
NotificationItemRenderer correctly handles all defined notification types
The verification confirms that the NotificationItemRenderer component handles all notification verbs defined in the NOTIFICATION_VERB constants:
commentCreated→ Rendered byCommentCreatedcomponentcommentReplyCreated→ Rendered byCommentReplycomponentreactionCreated→ Rendered byReactionCreatedcomponent
The implementation also includes a default case that returns null for any undefined verbs, making it resilient to future additions. The documentation in NotificationsModule.mdx provides clear instructions for extending the system with new notification types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the DefaultNotificationItemRenderer handles all notification verbs
ast-grep --pattern 'switch (notification.verb) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1589
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the notification verb enum/constants
rg "NOTIFICATION_VERB" -B 2 -A 5
Length of output: 5465
packages/design-system/public/mockServiceWorker.js (4)
16-90: LGTM! Well-structured service worker lifecycle management
The implementation properly handles:
- Service worker installation and activation
- Client validation and management
- Various mock service commands
- Cleanup of inactive clients
92-116: LGTM! Robust request filtering and handling
The fetch event handler implements proper request filtering and secure request ID generation.
118-281: LGTM! Comprehensive request handling implementation
The request handling implementation is thorough and well-structured, covering:
- Proper client resolution
- Response cloning and transfer
- Headers management
- Mock response handling with appropriate status codes
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 191-191: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 253-253: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
4-14: Verify MSW version and production safeguards
The Mock Service Worker is at version 2.4.4. Ensure that:
- This version is compatible with your testing environment
- Proper safeguards are in place to prevent this file from being served in production
Let's verify the production safeguards and version compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
MSW is properly configured for development only
Based on the verification results:
- MSW is correctly set up as a development dependency, specifically for Storybook usage (
"msw": "catalog:storybook") - The service worker file is properly isolated:
- It's excluded from production builds via tsconfig.build.json
- It's only referenced in development configurations (.eslintrc.js)
- The version (2.4.4) is managed through Storybook's catalog, ensuring compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this file is excluded from production builds
fd -t f "webpack|rollup|vite" -x grep -l "mockServiceWorker.js"
# Check package.json for MSW version
fd "package.json" -x jq -r '.dependencies["msw"] // .devDependencies["msw"]'
Length of output: 226
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json files directly for MSW dependency
fd "package.json" -x cat {} \; | grep -A 1 -B 1 "msw"
# Check for any build configuration files in the design-system package
fd -t f "webpack|rollup|vite|tsconfig" -d 2 . packages/design-system/
# Check if there are any production build configurations
fd -t f "prod|production" -d 3 . packages/design-system/
Length of output: 872
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the tsconfig files content for any production-related configurations
cat packages/design-system/tsconfig.build.json packages/design-system/tsconfig.json
# Check if the mockServiceWorker.js is used only in development/testing
rg -l "mockServiceWorker" -g "*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}"
# Check storybook configuration as MSW seems to be used with storybook
fd -t f ".storybook" -x cat {} \;
Length of output: 632
__package_name__package update -v __package_version__Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes v0.0.40
New Features
Refactoring
Documentation
Chores