Bump projection extension to v1.1.0

[tschaub]

Related Issue(s): #

stac-extensions/projection#17

Description:

This updates the projection extension to use v1.1.0.

PR Checklist:

• Code is formatted (run pre-commit run --all-files)
• Tests pass (run scripts/test)
• Documentation has been updated to reflect changes, if applicable
• This PR maintains or improves overall codebase code coverage.
• Changes are added to the CHANGELOG. See the docs for information about adding to the changelog.

[gadomski]

Do we need the projection v1.1.0 schema in the test data files?

[tschaub]

@gadomski - Let me know if you think we should add more tests to explicitly cover v1.0 vs v1.1 changes. The one added example covers the optional proj:epsg property at the item level. I also didn't update notebooks or other examples that use the projection schema URL. Happy to make additional changes.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Base: 90.05% // Head: 90.06% // Increases project coverage by +0.01% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (285e2aa) compared to base (be0b6c0).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #989      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.05%   90.06%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        6162     6162              
  Branches      917      917              
==========================================
+ Hits         5549     5550       +1     
  Misses        431      431              
+ Partials      182      181       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pystac/extensions/projection.py	98.47% <100.00%> (ø)
pystac/extensions/hooks.py	83.05% <0.00%> (+1.69%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tschaub]

Do we need the projection v1.1.0 schema in the test data files?

I only guessed that local files might be used instead of making network requests when validating. But I didn't confirm. I'll remove it and see how it works.

[tschaub]

I only guessed that local files might be used instead of making network requests when validating. But I didn't confirm. I'll remove it and see how it works.

@gadomski - Looks like tests pass without the schema file. Latest commit omits it.

[gadomski]

LGTM. @tschaub I just went ahead and made the doc+examples update since I was in the code -- I added a note to docs/contributing.rst about those changes. Do you mind taking a look at those, and then we should be good to ?

[tschaub]

Looks good, @gadomski. Thanks for updating the docs and notebook. It looks like there are some pretty significant (unrelated) changes in the notebook. Assuming that might just be because it hasn't been updated / run in a while.

[gadomski]

It looks like there are some pretty significant (unrelated) changes in the notebook. Assuming that might just be because it hasn't been updated / run in a while.

Yup, the biggest change is adding the HTML output (enabled by #743), but I figured it wasn't worth doing a new PR just w/ that update. Thanks for checking.