-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
'pacdef package review' enhancement suggestions #36
Comments
Thanks for the suggestions!
That sounds reasonable.
So that you can save a single package in multiple groups? Do I have that right?
Yeah, that makes sense.
That's sensible as well. (I had also thought about adding some of these, but did not do it because it was "good enough for me" at the time.) In total, that would be a complete overhaul of the review frontend. We could still do this prompt-based. I'm thinking whether it would be better to program a kind of menu. Either way, I currently cannot commit to doing this due to other priorities, but I could definitely coach someone who would like to give it a try. @ostrich you don't by chance have any experience with Rust and would like to try? |
Yup.
I wish. I'd love to help out if I could. I should use this as a kick in the pants to start looking into Rust. |
Understood. Then this will probably stay open for a while. Feel free to write something if the "kick in the pants" has successfully occurred. ;) |
Add the 'a(p)ply' part to the review prompt, which applies all actions that were put in so far. When the user has too many packages to review, this allows them to process the packages in chunks of arbitrary sizes. Related to #36.
Would making a TUI using ratatui be a good way of implementing this? I would be happy to take a shot at an implementation. |
ratatui is what I also thought of using here. If you'd like to give it a try, feel free! Be advised though that #62 touches the same topic, but the fork from @mike-lloyd03 hasn't seen any commits for the past 3 weeks, so I'm not sure if he's abandoned this. Thanks a lot! |
I'm sorry. I gave NixOS another chance and seem to have things working. I'm still not sure if I'm committed to it but for now, I won't be able to work on #62. :( |
A couple minor changes to
pacdef package review
would improve it a lot.q
quit. Currently all changes are lost until the entire list has been reviewed.Some other changes would improve it even more.
(This one deserves its own issue, but I'm hesitant to spam your issue list. Let me know if you want a separate issue for it.) Finally, a function similar to
pacdef package unmanaged
that instead shows all explicitly installed packages along with which group(s) they're in; if unmanaged, show no group.Hopefully that wasn't too much. It comes from a place of love. Your utility is incredibly useful and I'm excited to watch it continue to improve and grow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: