Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore/ready for 2025 #296

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 24, 2025
Merged

chore/ready for 2025 #296

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 24, 2025

Conversation

ff6347
Copy link
Collaborator

@ff6347 ff6347 commented Mar 24, 2025

Just some docs and npm scripts. Will merge this without review.

ff6347 added 3 commits March 18, 2025 10:16
…ructions

- Added a section on database caveats regarding the use of materialized views.
- Included SQL commands for disabling triggers before restoring data and refreshing materialized views afterward.
- This enhances clarity on managing tree statistics in the database.
- Added a rule to ignore user-specific cursor rules in the .cursor/rules directory.
- This helps keep the repository clean by excluding user-specific configurations.
@ff6347 ff6347 requested a review from raphael-arce as a code owner March 24, 2025 11:41
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giessdenkiez-de-postgres-api ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 24, 2025 11:41am

@ff6347 ff6347 changed the base branch from master to staging March 24, 2025 11:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@raphael-arce raphael-arce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 👍

@ff6347 ff6347 merged commit c923b5c into staging Mar 24, 2025
4 checks passed
@ff6347 ff6347 deleted the chore/ready-for-2025 branch March 24, 2025 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants