Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document odd kubectl get output for pods w/ sidecars #1600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 21, 2019
Merged

Document odd kubectl get output for pods w/ sidecars #1600

merged 1 commit into from Nov 21, 2019

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 21, 2019

Changes

With the current sidecar implementation kubectl get pods will show pods with successful sidecars as Completed but pods with errored sidecars as Error.

It looks like the kubectl get pods printer code is just using the status of the last container in the container list as the source of the "Reason" that it prints for a pod ending. Seems a bit janky but ¯_(ツ)_/¯

I'm documenting the behaviour rather than looking to fix it since there's are existing proposals to improve the sidecar implementation and this appears to simple be a UI/UX issue. The status of the TaskRun that generated the pod has the correct end status regardless of the output from kubectl get pods.

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

Describe any user facing changes here, or delete this block.

Examples of user facing changes:
- API changes
- Bug fixes
- Any changes in behavior

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Nov 21, 2019
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 21, 2019
With the current sidecar implementation `kubectl get pods` will
show pods with successful sidecars as Completed but pods with
errored sidecars as Error.

It looks like the kubectl get pods printer code is just using
the status of the last container in the container list as the
source of the "Reason" that it prints for a pod ending. Seems
a bit janky but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I'm documenting the behaviour rather than looking to fix it since
there's are existing proposals to improve the sidecar
implementation and this appears to simple be a UI/UX issue. The
status of the TaskRun that generated the pod has the correct
end status regardless of the output from `kubectl get pods`.
Copy link
Member

@dibyom dibyom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2019
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dibyom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 21, 2019
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit c9a7a35 into tektoncd:master Nov 21, 2019
@ghost ghost deleted the document-sidecar-exit-pod-behaviour branch November 22, 2019 13:21
but an Error when the sidecar exits with an error. This is only apparent when
using `kubectl` to get the pods of a TaskRun, not when describing the Pod
using `kubectl describe pod ...` nor when looking at the TaskRun, but can be quite
confusing.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI: maybe we want to add that tektoncd-cliwould do the right thing too,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants