Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an archival queue factory #3562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

MichaelSnowden
Copy link
Contributor

What changed?
Adds an archival queue factory to create the archival queue.

Why?
I made this change to instantiate the archival queue.

How did you test it?
I added a unit test.

Potential risks
Not used in production.

Is hotfix candidate?
No.

@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the durable-archival/queue-factory branch from 5210cf3 to e637864 Compare November 7, 2022 06:53
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2022 18:08
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2022 18:08
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden marked this pull request as draft November 7, 2022 18:26
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2022 18:45
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2022 23:54
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2022 19:42
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the durable-archival/queue-factory branch 2 times, most recently from 6e8c94f to c93f864 Compare November 28, 2022 22:50
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden changed the base branch from durable-archival/queue-factory-base to da-q-processors November 28, 2022 22:50
Copy link
Member

@yycptt yycptt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. 👍 Please land after addressing the comments.

@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the durable-archival/queue-factory branch from dd30d67 to 698e70e Compare December 5, 2022 22:02
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the da-q-processors branch 2 times, most recently from 6ab08a1 to 3ecd20b Compare December 6, 2022 19:19
@yux0
Copy link
Contributor

yux0 commented Dec 6, 2022

nit: archival_queue_task_executor_test.go and archival_queue_task_executor.go

@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the durable-archival/queue-factory branch from 698e70e to 274bfe0 Compare December 8, 2022 06:36
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the da-q-processors branch 2 times, most recently from 98a3a68 to e677f15 Compare December 8, 2022 06:42
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the durable-archival/queue-factory branch from 274bfe0 to 2918045 Compare December 8, 2022 06:42
@MichaelSnowden
Copy link
Contributor Author

nit: archival_queue_task_executor_test.go and archival_queue_task_executor.go

Fixed (in the parent branch), and also fixed for the factory in this branch.

@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the da-q-processors branch 3 times, most recently from 9ee1de8 to 84a8be9 Compare December 9, 2022 04:25
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the durable-archival/queue-factory branch 2 times, most recently from 60eacbf to d082323 Compare December 9, 2022 19:49
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the da-q-processors branch 3 times, most recently from 604cc96 to 7e0a1b3 Compare December 13, 2022 19:47
Base automatically changed from da-q-processors to master December 13, 2022 20:14
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden force-pushed the durable-archival/queue-factory branch from d082323 to 384a43f Compare December 13, 2022 20:19
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden merged commit 532c422 into master Dec 13, 2022
@MichaelSnowden MichaelSnowden deleted the durable-archival/queue-factory branch December 13, 2022 21:23
MichaelSnowden added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants