Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub: T5400: evaluate OPAM environment before package build #4379

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

c-po
Copy link
Member

@c-po c-po commented Mar 4, 2025

Change summary

When moving libvyosconfig to vyos-1x package build process, we need the OPAM environment first.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • Migration from an old Vyatta component to vyos-1x, please link to related PR inside obsoleted component
  • Other (please describe):

Related Task(s)

Related PR(s)

How to test / Smoketest result

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • I have linked this PR to one or more Phabricator Task(s)
  • I have run the components SMOKETESTS if applicable
  • My commit headlines contain a valid Task id
  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

@c-po c-po requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2025 15:01
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2025

👍
No issues in PR Title / Commit Title

@c-po c-po merged commit a4ba60b into current Mar 4, 2025
12 checks passed
@c-po c-po deleted the c-po-patch-1 branch March 4, 2025 15:03
@vyosbot vyosbot added the mirror-initiated This PR initiated for mirror sync workflow label Mar 4, 2025
@kumvijaya kumvijaya removed the mirror-initiated This PR initiated for mirror sync workflow label Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants