-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve the clarity of handle_object_info_request
in authority.rs
#472
Comments
mwtian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2022
mwtian
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2022
) We operate an executor with a bound on the concurrent number of messages (see #463, #559, #706). PR #472 added logging for the bound being hit. We expect the executors to operate for a long time at this limit (e.g. in recovery situation). The spammy logging is not usfeful This removes the logging of the concurrency bound being hit. Fixes #759
mwtian
pushed a commit
to mwtian/sui
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2022
mwtian
pushed a commit
to mwtian/sui
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2022
…ystenLabs#763) We operate an executor with a bound on the concurrent number of messages (see MystenLabs#463, MystenLabs#559, MystenLabs#706). PR MystenLabs#472 added logging for the bound being hit. We expect the executors to operate for a long time at this limit (e.g. in recovery situation). The spammy logging is not usfeful This removes the logging of the concurrency bound being hit. Fixes MystenLabs#759
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
handle_object_info_request
currently serves two purposes:It can be confusing to mix the two functionalities. For example, there are may be specific checks we want to do when requesting the latest object (cross checking the object digest and etc.). And we want to make sure we don't use the latest object state in the response if we are requesting the historical information.
Some context on the discussion:
https://mysten-labs.slack.com/archives/C02GD7J9HUM/p1645124209747649
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: