[workspace] Upgrade openusd_internal to latest release v25.02

[nicolecheetham]

Towards: #22536

---

This change is 

[jwnimmer-tri]

I'll let @rpoyner-tri take this one. Given NVidia's radio silence, possibly the right answer here is to mark commit_pin = True instead, and decline to keep upgrading it until the USD parsing project unpauses?

[rpoyner-tri]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 1 unresolved discussion, LGTM missing from assignee rpoyner-tri(platform), needs at least two assigned reviewers, commits need curation (https://drake.mit.edu/reviewable.html#curated-commits) (waiting on @nicolecheetham)

---

a discussion (no related file):
I believe the offered fixup is correct. The previously patched file has been moved or rewritten, and include statements in all similarly named files use the correct syntax.

[rpoyner-tri]

+@jwnimmer-tri or delegate for second review.

with co-author caveats

Reviewable status: 1 unresolved discussion, LGTM missing from assignee jwnimmer-tri(platform), commits need curation (https://drake.mit.edu/reviewable.html#curated-commits) (waiting on @nicolecheetham)

[jwnimmer-tri]

The build isn't all the way fixed yet (see Jenkins errors).

[rpoyner-tri]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 1 unresolved discussion, LGTM missing from assignee jwnimmer-tri(platform), commits need curation (https://drake.mit.edu/reviewable.html#curated-commits) (waiting on @nicolecheetham)

[jwnimmer-tri]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2, 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: commits need curation (https://drake.mit.edu/reviewable.html#curated-commits) (waiting on @nicolecheetham)