Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jacobian class #665

Closed
rtimms opened this issue Oct 16, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #670
Closed

Jacobian class #665

rtimms opened this issue Oct 16, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #670
Assignees

Comments

@rtimms
Copy link
Contributor

rtimms commented Oct 16, 2019

Create a class for Jacobian similar to Simplification that reuses known jacobians

@rtimms rtimms self-assigned this Oct 16, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2019
@Scottmar93
Copy link
Contributor

maybe we want to be careful about storing used Jacobians if RAM has been an issue when calculating the jacobian. If this becomes an issue, we could set a flag on specific symbols so that they can be stored and not others (e.g. the i_cc term in the 2+1D case).

@Scottmar93
Copy link
Contributor

just do this along with #651 ?

rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2019
@rtimms rtimms mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2019
8 tasks
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2019
rtimms added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants