docs: Add documentation for non-interactive safe-cli commands

[falvaradorodriguez]

Closes safe-global/safe-cli#434

To be considered:

• The demos and guides sections have been unified to follow the same format as in other documentation sections. Each demo has been integrated as a new guide.
• Added documentation of the new command options in safe-cli.

[github-actions]

Branch preview

✅ Deployed successfully in branch deployment:

https://add_non_interactive_commands_safe_cli--docs.review.5afe.dev

[github-actions]

Overall readability score: 53.57 (🟢 +0.09)

File	Readability
common-commands.mdx	82.47 (🟢 +0.48)
unattended-commands.mdx	61.68 (-)
faq.md	46.96 (🟢 +0)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
common-commands.mdx	82.47	68.16	6.48	7.9	8.97	6.3
	🟢 +0.48	🟢 +0	🟢 +0.05	🟢 +0.1	🟢 +0.06	🟢 +0.05
unattended-commands.mdx	61.68	48.5	9.85	10.7	11.71	7.49
	-	-	-	-	-	-
faq.md	46.96	50.06	13.07	14.3	12.59	8.42
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	53.57	47	11.07	13.07	12.76	7.76
	🟢 +0.09	🟢 +0.02	🟢 +0.02	🟢 +0.03	🟢 +0.01	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[valle-xyz]

This PR works, but I have some remarks:

• Three new guides are links to videos without sound. I don't find this optimal. The guides should be written guides, and the videos should be accompanied.
• The reference is complete, but the design can be improved.
• We could even consider adding each command in its own sidebar link, as with the Api Kit Reference.

I am unsure what to do here, so I will ask @tanay1337 and @germartinez. I would say we can accept this PR and open a ticket for ourselves to improve the quality of these docs.

[falvaradorodriguez]

This PR works, but I have some remarks:

• Three new guides are links to videos without sound. I don't find this optimal. The guides should be written guides, and the videos should be accompanied.
• The reference is complete, but the design can be improved.
• We could even consider adding each command in its own sidebar link, as with the Api Kit Reference.

I am unsure what to do here, so I will ask @tanay1337 and @germartinez. I would say we can accept this PR and open a ticket for ourselves to improve the quality of these docs.

Just to clarify, the guides have been moved from the "Demo" section to the "Guides" section, for share the same structure in all projects in safe-docs. But these videos already existed in the doc.

[valle-xyz]

Hey Felipe,

to merge this PR, we would require to either:

• update the guides to proper (written) guides (example).
• Or remove the guide updates from the PR

We aim for consistency in the docs regarding what a guide and what a tutorial is.

So we would ask you to fix this to speed up the review of this PR, or we would take it up in the next sprint.

[falvaradorodriguez]

Hey Felipe,

to merge this PR, we would require to either:

• update the guides to proper (written) guides (example).
• Or remove the guide updates from the PR

We aim for consistency in the docs regarding what a guide and what a tutorial is.

So we would ask you to fix this to speed up the review of this PR, or we would take it up in the next sprint.

Hi @valle-xyz,

Since this is not a trivial change, I have opted to revert the updating of the Demos section.

Thanks.

[valle-xyz]

I added minor grammarly correction. Looks good to me.